Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 8;8(60):34459–34467. doi: 10.1039/c8ra06494f

Optimization the reaction condition of annulation of 1a with 2a.

Entry Base catalyst Solvent Conv. heating Sonication MW irradiation
Yielde % Time (h) Yielde % Time (min) Yielde % Time (min)
1 Et3Nb EtOH 66 4 70 70 75 7
2 Et3Nc EtOH 74f 2 79g 50 87h 5
3 Et3Nd EtOH 70 3 73 60 80 6
4 Et3Nc MeOH 55 6 60 80 70 10
5 Et3Nc i-PrOH 68 7 72 80 80 10
6 Et3Nc n-Hexane 28 9 30 100 40 15
7 Et3Nc 1,4-Dioxane 38 8 40 100 45 15
8 Et3Nc DMF 42 9 45 110 55 20
9 Et3Nc Toluene 34 8 37 100 42 15
10 Pyridinec EtOH 55i 6 60j 80 75k 15
11 DABCOc EtOH 30 11 35 110 41 20
12 DBUc EtOH 30 11 36 110 46 20
13 NaHCO3c EtOH 34 9 36 90 42 12
14 K2CO3c EtOH 38 7 40 90 45 15
15 NaOHc EtOH 30 7 30 100 40 15
a

Reaction conditions: phenylhydrazonopropanal 1a (2 mmol), acetoacetanilide 2 (4 mmol), solvent (15 mL) and base (10–30 mol%), conventional heating at reflux for 2–11 h, ultrasound at 80 °C for 50–110 min, microwave irradiation at 80 °C (200 W) for 5–20 min.

b

Base 10 mol%.

c

Base 20 mol%.

d

Base 30 mol%.

e

Isolated yields.

f

Yield was 12% after 20 min and 50% after 80 min.

g

Yield was 30% after 20 min and 62% after 40 min.

h

Yield was 53% after 3 min.

i

Yield was 17% after 2 h.

j

Yield was 38% after 50 min.

k

Yield was 25% after 5 min.