Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 27;14:778093. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.778093

Table 2.

Summary of studies on social cognition in the behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia.

References Design Patients (N) Mean age of patients (S.D) HC (N) Mean age of HC (S.D) SC domains Assessment tools Results JBI
Torralva et al. (2009) C-S 35 G1: 65 (7.4), G2: 69.1(5.7) 14 65.5 (6.5) ToM RMET, FPT Patients impaired in ToM G
Grossman et al. (2010) C-S 19 62.38 (12.30) 19 72.55 (6.85) ToM Ad-hoc test Patients impaired in ToM M
Baez et al. (2014) C-S 37 66.0 (7.43) 30 55 (8.64) ToM, EP TASIT, RMET, EPT, SNQ Patients impaired in EP G
Cerami et al. (2014) C-S 18 63.36 (7.47) 36 62.83 (7.95) ToM, EP, AB Ad-hoc test Patients impaired in AB M
Savage et al. (2014) C-S 54 62.5 (9.9) 30 63.4 (4.2) EP TASIT, EDT Patients impaired in EP G
Cerami et al. (2015) C-S 17 67.88 (9.92) N/A N/A EP E60, SET, IRI Patients impaired in EP G
Custodio et al. (2015) C-S 28 65.15 (2.95) 20 66.4 (3.9) ToM FBT, RMET Patients impaired in ToM G
Oliver et al. (2015) C-S 24 64.7 (7.9) 24 65 (8.5) EP IRI; MET Patients impaired in EP G
Torralva et al. (2015) C-S 14 69.9 (8.5) 18 64.5 (6.4) ToM RMET, FPT Patients impaired in ToM G
Van den Stock et al. (2015) C-S 20 65.7 (8.7) 22 66.6 (6.1) EP Ad-hoc test Patients impaired in EP G
Baez et al. (2016b) C-S 21 63.80 (7.33) 19 60.42 (6.77) AB Ad-hoc test Patients impaired in AB G
Jastorff et al. (2016) C-S 14 67.2 (8.4) 19 66.5 (6.3) EP Ad-hoc test Patients impaired in EP G
Sedeno et al. (2016) C-S 14 66.42 (6.83) 12 62.58 (6.30) ToM TASIT; RMET Patients impaired in ToM G
Tabernero and Politis (2016) C-S 26 68.0 (7.0) 23 68.0 (7.0) EP, ToM E60, FPT, RMET Patients impaired in all domains M
Tabernero et al. (2017) C-S 26 67.42 (6.41) 30 69.97 (8.2) EP, ToM RMET, FPT, IGT Patients impaired in all domains M
Van den Stock et al. (2017) C-S 13 66.6 (7.22) 19 66.5 (6.28) EP, SP, AB Ad-hoc test, RMET Patients impaired in all domains G
Gossink et al. (2018) Lo 22 62.8 (6.7) N/A N/A EP, ToM E60, FPT bvFTD more impaired than other ND M
Reus et al. (2018) Lo 34 63.2 (6.7) N/A N/A EP, ToM E60, FPT No change over time in EP or ToM G
Schroeter et al. (2018) C-S 86 63.9 (9.6) 43 66.1 (10.1) ToM RMET Patients impaired in ToM G
Giovagnoli et al. (2019) C-S 14 56.79 (14.92) 14 56.57 (12.05) ToM FPT Patients impaired in ToM G
Van den Stock et al. (2019) C-S 15 67.3 (6.65) 19 66.6 (6.45) ToM FH Patients impaired in ToM G
Kawano et al. (2020) C-S 23 60 (7) 30 59 (8) EP Ekman Patients impaired in EP M
Lillo et al. (2020) C-S 20 61.5 (6.3) 21 59.2 (8.8) ToM, EP Mini-SEA Patients impaired in EP and ToM M

AB, Attribution Bias; ADFES, Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set; CATS, Affect Matching subtest of the Comprehensive Affect Testing System; C-S, Cross-sectional; EDT, Emotion Detection task; E60, Ekman60; EP, Emotional Processing; EPT, Empathy for Pain task; FBT, False belief task; FH, Frith-Happé animations task; FIT, Facial Identification task; FPT, Faux paux test; G, Good; G1, group 1; G2, group 2; GRN-PPA, progranulin-associated aphasia; HC, Healthy Controls; IGT, Iowa Gambling Task; IRI, Interpersonal Reactivity Index; JBI, Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Evaluation Checklists; Le, Left; L, Low; Lo, Longitudinal; lvPPA, logopenic variant PPA; M, Moderate; MET, Multifaceted Empathy Test; mini-SEA, mini Social cognition and Emotion Assessment; N/A, not available; ND, neurodegenerative dementia; nfvPPA, Non fluent variant PPA; RMET, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test; R, Right; SET, test Storey-based Empathy Task; SNQ, Social Norms Questionnaire; SP, Social Perception; svPPA, semantic variant PPA; TASIT, The Awareness of Social Inference Test; ToM, Theory of Mind; TRCT, The Referential Communication Task.