Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 27;13:859013. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.859013

Table 4.

Survival analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival in 41 PDTCs*.

Characteristics Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR p 95% CI HR p 95% CI
Gender Men vs. Women 0.87 0.733 (0.39–1.95)
Age (years) 1.03 0.041 (1–1.06) 1.02 0.3222 (0.98–1.06)
T3/T4 vs. T1/T2 4.01 0.024 (1.2–13.43) 0.46 0.4653 (0.06–3.69)
N1 vs. N0 2.8 0.098 (0.83–9.49)
M1 vs. M0 3.62 0.024 (1.19–11.04) 14.45 <0.001 (3.23–64.7)
PDL1 Positive vs. Negative 1.57 0.303 (0.67–3.69)
PD1 Positive vs. Negative 0.92 0.91 (0.21–3.96)
TIGIT Positive vs. Negative 3.25 0.004 (1.46–7.21) 1.76 0.266 (0.65–4.79)
LAG3 Positive vs. Negative 1.14 0.794 (0.42–3.08)
VISTA Strong vs. Others 3.22 0.007 (1.38–7.53) 0.68 0.5428 (0.2–2.33)
B7H3 Strong vs. Others 3.57 0.007 (1.41–8.99) 12.14 0.0025 (2.41–61.14)
CTLA4 Positive vs. Negative 2.04 0.08 (0.92–4.54)
BTLA Positive vs. Negative 1.29 0.584 (0.51–3.25)
TIM3 Strong vs. Others 4.83 <0.001 (2.03–11.51) 8.25 <0.001 (2.4–28.31)

*Three patients were excluded (two were lost to follow-up and one had followed up in less than 1 month).

The bold values indicates that the p values are less than 0.05, which is considered statistically significant.