Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 15;10(5):1579–1591. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2781

TABLE 3.

Stratified meta‐analysis of salt/sodium intake and risk of NAFLD

Characteristics Number of studies Summary OR (95% CI) p‐for‐difference p‐for‐heterogeneity I2 (%)
Overall 7 1.60 (1.19–2.15) <.001 96.74
Region
Asia 4 1.46 (1.09–1.95) .597 <.001 95.20
America/Europe 3 1.79 (0.88–3.62) <.001 96.80
Study design
Cohort/Case–control 2 1.34 (1.15–1.56) .285 .421 0.00
Cross‐sectional 5 1.68 (1.14–2.47) <.001 97.80
Risk of bias
Low 4 1.81 (1.24–2.65) .031 <.001 96.30
High/Very high 3 1.19 (1.13–1.24) .383 0.00
Methods of NAFLD ascertainment
Fibroscan/Ultrasonography 4 1.19 (1.14–1.25) .023 .392 0.00
Fatty liver index (FLI) 3 2.02 (1.29–3.17) <.001 96.70
Exposure
Dietary instruments 5 1.23 (1.15–1.32) .005 .31 16.20
Urinary sodium excretion 2 2.48 (1.52–4.06) <.001 96.00

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; OR, odds ratio.

Bold values indicates the significant p‐values (p<0.05).