Table 8.
Results of a binary logistic regression analysis predicting fast food consumption (N = 814).
| B a | SE B | OR | B b | SE B | OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diet | ||||||
| Vegetarian | −0.889 | 0.345 | 0.411** | −0.961 | 0.401 | 0.383* |
| Flexitarian | −0.397 | 0.236 | 0.672 | −0.374 | 0.249 | 0.688 |
| Regular meat-eater | 0.000 | 0.219 | 1.000 | 0.068 | 0.227 | 1.071 |
| High meat-eater (reference) | ||||||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 0.206 | 0.182 | 1.229 | 0.175 | 0.197 | 1.191 |
| Female (reference) | ||||||
| Age (years, continuous) | −0.050 | 0.007 | 0.951*** | −0.044 | 0.007 | 0.957*** |
| Education | ||||||
| Low | −0.342 | 0.230 | 0.710 | −0.263 | 0.246 | 0.769 |
| Middle | −0.131 | 0.233 | 0.877 | −0.076 | 0.244 | 0.927 |
| High (reference) | ||||||
| Attitudinal and behavioral variables (factors, continuous) | ||||||
| Infrequent cooking/prepared ingredients | 0.356 | 0.099 | 1.427*** | |||
| Frequent cooking/fresh ingredients | −0.111 | 0.101 | 0.895 | |||
| Meat attachment | −0.081 | 0.113 | 0.922 | |||
| Food innovativeness | 0.137 | 0.097 | 1.146 | |||
| Dietary guidelines | −0.082 | 0.115 | 0.921 | |||
| Sustainable food choice motives | −0.111 | 0.110 | 0.895 | |||
| Organic food stores | 0.277 | 0.107 | 1.319** | |||
| Nagelkerke R square (%) | 18.7 | 23.1 | ||||
Significant predictors are displayed in bold font.
B, Beta coefficient; SE, Standard Error; OR, Odds Ratio.
Adjusted for gender, age, and education.
Adjusted for gender, age, education, attitudinal and behavioral variables.
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.