Skip to main content
. 2022 May 12;288:106824. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2022.106824

Table 5.

Comparison of different blockers for Mpro of SARS-CoV-2, blockers' structures, and software used for docking.

Compound Chemical structure Target Software Ref.
Telaprevir Image 63 Mpro MOE software package, MD by Schrödinger, Maestro software [127]
Boceprevir Image 64 Mpro MD by GROMACS and Schrödinger, AutoDock Vina [128]
Beclabuvir Image 65 Mpro Autodock vina &
SMINA
Pymol & Rasmol
[1]
Compound 621 Image 66 Mpro AutoDock Vina, AMBER 18 simulation package [3]
Paritaprevir Image 67 Mpro AutoDock Vina, AMBER 18 simulation package [3,12]
Simeprevir Image 68 Mpro AutoDock Vina, AMBER 18 simulation package [3,11]
Atazanavir Image 69 Mpro Autodock tools [16,129]
Efavirenz Image 70 Mpro AutoDock Vina [130]
Grazoprevir Image 71 Mpro AutoDock Vina, MD by GROMACS [131]
Ritonavir Image 72 Mpro mathematical pose (MathPose), mathemat ical deep learning (MathDL) [14]
Bortezomib Image 73 Mpro mathematical pose (MathPose), mathemat ical deep learning (MathDL) [14]
Carfilzomib Image 74 Mpro Schrodinger, AMBER, Glide7 flexible docking program [19]
Valrubicin Image 75 Mpro Schrodinger, AMBER, Glide7 flexible docking program [19]
Pitavastatin Image 76 Mpro PyMol, SMINA forked of AutoDock Vina [47]
Perampanel Image 77 Mpro PyMol, SMINA forked of AutoDock Vina [47]
Curcumin Image 78 Mpro Glide docking module of Maestro, OPLS3e force field, CovDock module of Schrödinger Suite, MD by GROMACS [132]
ZINC03231196 Image 79 Mpro Maestro software, MD by AMBER16 [133]
Nirmatrelvir Image 80 Mpro [134]