Skip to main content
. 2022 May 11;12:7778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12034-6

Table 4.

Sensitivity analysis of CVD mortality risk associated with late non-fasting plasma glucose (dichotomous) in 4042 participants, a stratified by HbA1c.

HbA1c Model 1 Model 2
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Plasma glucose ≥ 105 vs < 105 mg/dL
< 5.7% 0.91 (0.65–1.27) 0.574 0.93 (0.66–1.30) 0.651
5.7%-6.4% 1.30 (0.92–1.84) 0.141 1.22 (0.86–1.74) 0.267
≥ 6.5% 1.56 (0.96–2.55) 0.076 1.27 (0.74–2.18) 0.394
Plasma glucose ≥ 110 vs < 110 mg/dL
< 5.7% 1.01 (0.65–1.57) 0.969 1.03 (0.66–1.59) 0.913
5.7%-6.4% 1.80 (1.15–2.81) 0.011 1.67 (1.06–2.63) 0.028
≥ 6.5% 1.38 (0.88–2.16) 0.161 1.06 (0.63–1.79) 0.824
Plasma glucose ≥ 115 vs < 115 mg/dL
< 5.7% 2.09 (1.19–3.68) 0.011 2.17 (1.22–3.83) 0.008
5.7%-6.4% 1.94 (1.09–3.46) 0.025 1.87 (1.05–3.33) 0.034
≥ 6.5% 1.46 (0.95–2.24) 0.084 1.13 (0.68–1.89) 0.640

CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HR, hazard ratio.

aThe late non-fasting sub-cohort included 5564 participants, among which 1522 died of non-CVD causes. This sensitivity analysis was conducted on the remaining 4042 participants after exclusion of these 1522 participants.

Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, obesity, education, poverty-income ratio, survey period, physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking status, self-reported hypertension, and self-reported hypercholesterolemia.

Model 2: adjusted for all the factors in Model 1 plus natural log-transformed HbA1c.