Skip to main content
. 2022 May 11;13:2592. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30248-0

Table 2.

Statistics of the top genes by using different methods and alternate allele frequency thresholds.

Cohorts and genes Methoda n1 n2 n3 n4 P value
AF ≤8e–5
 CNS (n = 336) NF1 Jointly called full genotype 12 324 6 8169 1.77e–13
CoCoRV using in-house controls 11 325 6 8169 3.09e–12
CoCoRV using gnomAD as controls 11 325 262 125,486 2.82e–10
 ALL (n = 958) ETV6 Jointly called full genotypes 6 952 0 8175 1.31e–06
CoCoRV using in-house controls 7 951 1 8174 9.96e–07
CoCoRV using gnomAD as controls 7 951 5 125,743 1.06e–12
AF ≤1e–3
 CNS (n = 336) NF1 Jointly called full genotype 12 324 11 8164 1.08e–11
CoCoRV using in-house controls 11 325 11 8164 1.48e–10
CoCoRV using gnomAD as controls 11 325 289 125,459 7.60e–10
 ALL (n = 958) ETV6 Jointly called full genotypes 6 952 0 8175 1.31e–06
CoCoRV using in-house controls 7 951 1 8174 9.96e–07
CoCoRV using gnomAD as controls 7 951 5 125,743 1.06e–12

AF alternate allele frequency, ALL acute lymphoblastic leukemia, CNS central nervous system.

aThe CoCoRV results were calculated based on the FET.

n1: number of cases with potential pathogenic alleles; n2: number of cases without potential pathogenic alleles; n3: number of controls with potential pathogenic alleles; n4: number of controls without potential pathogenic alleles.