Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 12;55(6):1745–1758. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27983

TABLE 4.

Statistical Results Comparing the Contrast‐Specific Variances Between ROC AUC Across Conditions CvBA and LGvHG

CvBA BID BIDS BIPF DK K MEADC
BID 0.177 0.538 0.029 0.505 0.032*
BIDS 0.955 <0.001* <0.001* <0.001*
BIPF <0.001* <0.001* <0.001*
DK <0.001* 0.998
K <0.001*
MEADC
LGvHG BID BIDS BIPF DK K MEADC
BID 0.260 0.696 0.015* 0.710 0.012*
BIDS 0.939 <0.001* <0.001* <0.001*
BIPF <0.001* 0.006* <0.001*
DK <0.001* 1.000
K <0.001*
MEADC

ROC AUC = receiver operating characteristic area under the curve; BID = bi‐exponential diffusion; DK = diffusion kurtosis; K = kurtosis; MEADC = mono‐exponential apparent diffusion coefficient.