Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 10;33(2):236–248. doi: 10.1177/09567976211032231

Table 2.

Significant Results From Linear and Mixed-Effects Models Predicting Electrodermal Activity

Model Estimate SE t p 95% CI R 2 σ2 τ00
A. Friend ratio predicting tonic SCL 3.86 1.77 2.18 .029 [0.39, 7.33] .90 14.28 115.23
B. Imminence predicting SCR frequency a −13.96 4.46 −3.13 .002 [−22.69, −5.23] .62 19.51 28.45
C. Imminence predicting SCR amplitude a −13.65 3.24 −4.22 < .001 [−20.00, −7.31] .66 10.30 17.96
D. Experienced fear predicting SCR frequency 0.58 0.21 2.71 .007 [0.16, 0.99] .62 19.60 27.21
E. Baseline orienting response predicting SCR frequency sensitization −0.01 0.004 −2.86 .005 [−0.02, −0.003] .05
F. Baseline orienting response predicting SCR amplitude sensitization 0.01 0.003 3.20 .002 [0.004, 0.02] .06

Note: Models A to D are mixed-effects models including random intercepts and controlling for the effects of time. Models E and F are linear regression models. For each model, the estimate is unstandardized, and the t is standardized. CI = confidence interval; SCL = skin conductance level; SCR = skin conductance response.

a

This model predicted quadratic effects.