Table 2.
Model | Estimate | SE | t | p | 95% CI | R 2 | σ2 | τ00 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Friend ratio predicting tonic SCL | 3.86 | 1.77 | 2.18 | .029 | [0.39, 7.33] | .90 | 14.28 | 115.23 |
B. Imminence predicting SCR frequency a | −13.96 | 4.46 | −3.13 | .002 | [−22.69, −5.23] | .62 | 19.51 | 28.45 |
C. Imminence predicting SCR amplitude a | −13.65 | 3.24 | −4.22 | < .001 | [−20.00, −7.31] | .66 | 10.30 | 17.96 |
D. Experienced fear predicting SCR frequency | 0.58 | 0.21 | 2.71 | .007 | [0.16, 0.99] | .62 | 19.60 | 27.21 |
E. Baseline orienting response predicting SCR frequency sensitization | −0.01 | 0.004 | −2.86 | .005 | [−0.02, −0.003] | .05 | ||
F. Baseline orienting response predicting SCR amplitude sensitization | 0.01 | 0.003 | 3.20 | .002 | [0.004, 0.02] | .06 |
Note: Models A to D are mixed-effects models including random intercepts and controlling for the effects of time. Models E and F are linear regression models. For each model, the estimate is unstandardized, and the t is standardized. CI = confidence interval; SCL = skin conductance level; SCR = skin conductance response.
This model predicted quadratic effects.