Table 3.
β | Standard error | Standard β | t | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The plasma nEV Aβ42 term alone explained 41.1% variation in average AV45 uptake | |||||
Intercept | 1.109 | 0.011 | 104.429 | < 0.001 | |
nEV Aβ42 | 0.028 | 0.003 | 0.641 | 10.921 | < 0.001 |
The plasma nEV Aβ42 plus clinical features explained 46.4% variation in average AV45 uptake | |||||
Intercept | 0.939 | 0.071 | 13.225 | < 0.001 | |
nEV Aβ42 | 0.025 | 0.003 | 0.573 | 9.695 | < 0.001 |
Age | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.154 | 2.691 | 0.008 |
Female | − 0.011 | 0.015 | − 0.043 | − 0.763 | 0.447 |
APOE ε4 status | 0.041 | 0.015 | 0.165 | 2.819 | 0.005 |
The plasma nEV Aβ42 plus clinical features and the interaction term explained 46.6% variation in average AV45 uptake | |||||
Intercept | 0.915 | 0.077 | 11.986 | < 0.001 | |
nEV Aβ42 | 0.029 | 0.005 | 0.651 | 5.986 | < 0.001 |
Age | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.166 | 2.815 | 0.005 |
Female | − 0.01 | 0.015 | − 0.039 | − 0.691 | 0.491 |
APOE ε4 status | 0.055 | 0.022 | 0.221 | 2.517 | 0.013 |
nEV Aβ42 * APOE ε4 status | − 0.005 | 0.006 | − 0.121 | − 0.858 | 0.392 |
The analysis was performed in total individuals including Aβ− NCs, Aβ+ NCs, and patients with aMCI and ADD. In the first model, nEV Aβ42 was used as a predictor of AV45 SUVR; in the second model, nEV Aβ42 plus age, sex, and APOE ε4 status were used as predictors of AV45 SUVR; in the third model, the interaction term between nEV Aβ42 and APOE ε4 status was additionally included
Abbreviations: Aβ β-amyloid, NCs cognitively normal controls, aMCI amnestic mild cognitive impairment, ADD Alzheimer’s disease dementia, APOE apolipoprotein E, nEV neuronal-derived extracellular vesicle, AV45 [18F]florbetapir