Table 3.
Outcome | Sensitivity analysis reason | Result |
---|---|---|
Good outcome | Changing from random- to fixed-effects To explore if the model choice influenced our results |
1.49 (1.30, 1.72) p < 0.00001 |
Leaving Larsson et al. out as outlier | 1.62 (1.40, 1.88) p < 0.00001 |
|
Mortality | Changing from fixed- to random-effects To explore if the model choice influenced our results |
0.45 (0.40, 0.51) p < 0.00001 |
Leaving Leker et al. out as outlier | 0.46 (0.41, 0.51) p < 0.00001 |
|
sICH | Changing from fixed- to random-effects To explore if the model choice influenced our results |
0.89 (0.59, 1.35) p = 0.58 |
Leaving Leker et al. out as outlier | 0.93 (0.66, 1.30) p = 0.66 |
|
Leaving Larsson et al. out as outlier | 0.83 (0.59, 1.17) p = 0.28 |