Skip to main content
. 2022 May 12;12:7878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11880-8

Table 2.

The classification comparation on the UCI and WISDM datasets.

Models Accuracy (%) Accuracy (%)
on UCI on WISDM
Inherent Features-based CNN4 91.75 91.50
Coherent Features-based CNN5 92.31 92.20
HAR-image CNN7 93.27 91.64
Multi-stage CNN10 94.29 93.19
Attention-based Multi-head CNN9 95.62 94.90
Temporal CNN6 96.31 95.71
Feature Embedding-based LSTM16 96.31 95.55
ConvAE-LSTM21 96.41 95.60
Attention-based LSTM22 95.18 93.74
Hybrid CNN and LSTM17 96.55 95.65
Proposed Method 96.71 95.86