Table 9.

Correlations between functional and structural connectivity and symbolic quantity discrimination efficiency gain in TD children and children with MLD in the training group (TD_Training and MLD_Training)

	TD_Training (N = 34†, 28‡)			MLD_Training (N = 18†, 15‡)
	ρ	p	BF	ρ	p	BF
Functional connectivity
L HIPP–L IPS	0.43*	0.012	3.98	0.52*	0.026	2.20
R HIPP–L IPS	0.38*	0.025	4.58	0.52*	0.027	0.93
L HIPP–R IPS	−0.16	0.358	0.44	<0.01	0.997	0.50
R HIPP–R IPS	0.03	0.855	0.39	0.32	0.197	0.54
Structural connectivity
L HIPP–L IPS	−0.07	0.734	0.42	−0.11	0.694	0.59
R HIPP–L IPS	−0.23	0.238	1.33	−0.25	0.362	0.54
L HIPP–R IPS	−0.05	0.806	0.43	−0.38	0.164	0.91
R HIPP–R IPS	0.03	0.897	0.41	−0.24	0.398	0.57

^†Number of participants included in functional connectivity analysis.

^‡Number of participants included in structural connectivity analysis.

*p <0.05.

Boldface BF values (>3) provide evidence for H₁. BF values between 0.33 and 3 provide absence of evidence (i.e., insufficient evidence for either H₁ or H_o; Keysers et al., 2020). HIPP, Hippocampus; L, left; R, right.