Study/setting |
Study design |
Intervention (type of appliance, type of attachment, mechanism of traction, type of withdrawal technique) |
Comparison (type of appliance, type of attachment, mechanism of traction, type of withdrawal technique) |
Outcome measures |
Conclusions |
Smailiene et al. (2013) [7], Sweden |
Q-RCT, unilateral PDC |
Fixed appliances, open surgical approach, and free eruption |
Fixed appliances, ballista loop, and closed flap surgery |
Duration of orthodontic traction, duration of orthodontic treatment, probing pocket depth, the width of keratinized tissue, gingival recession, bone support |
There were no significant differences in the post-treatment periodontal status of the canines and adjacent teeth either by open surgery with free eruption or by closed flap technique |
Parkin et al. (2012) [17], UK |
RCT, unilateral PDC |
Fixed appliances, eyelet attachment with a golden chain, and open surgical exposure |
Fixed appliances, eyelet attachment with a golden chain, and closed surgical exposure |
Actual surgical time, patient-reported outcome |
There was no difference in the operating time between the open and closed surgical techniques. There were no differences in any of the patient-reported outcomes between the two surgical procedures. Most participants reported pain, discomfort, impairment to everyday activities, and the need for regular analgesia after surgical exposure were of short duration and subsided after a few days |
Heravi et al. (2016) [15], Iran |
CCT, unilateral or bilateral PDC |
Fixed appliances, two miniscrews, cantilever springs, and open surgical exposure |
Fixed appliances, trans palatal arch (TPA), cantilever spring, and open surgical exposure |
Canine and lateral incisor root resorption, BOP, gingival index, patient’s pain experience, duration of orthodontic traction |
The mean duration of the forced eruption was 5.2 months in the control group and 5.1 months in the experimental group. The clinical success rate was 100%. TADs allow a more controlled movement of the impacted tooth |
Gharaibeh and Al-Nimri(2008) [12], Jordan |
Q-RCT, unilateral PDC |
Fixed appliances, a golden chain, and closed surgical exposure |
Fixed appliances, lingual button, a golden chain, and open surgical exposure |
Duration of surgery and the patient’s perception of pain |
The mean surgical duration for the open-eruption technique was 30.9 ± 10.1 minutes compared with 37.7 ± 8.4 minutes for the closed-eruption technique. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.006). On the first postoperative day, six patients (33%) in the close-eruption group reported severe pain compared with four patients (22%) in the open-eruption group. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.123) |
Björksved et al. (2018) [40], Sweden |
RCT, unilateral or bilateral PDC |
Fixed appliances, attachment with a chain, and closed surgical technique |
Fixed appliances and open surgical technique |
Surgery time, complications, and patients’ perceptions |
No statistically significant differences in surgery time between the two groups. Postoperative complications were similar between the groups in unilateral PDCs but more common in the open group in bilateral cases. More patients in the open group experienced pain and impairment compared to the closed group |
Parkin et al.(2013) [41], UK |
RCT, unilateral PDC |
Fixed appliances, twin-wire technique or elastic chain, and open surgical exposure |
Fixed appliances, twin-wire technique or elastic chain, and closed surgical exposure |
Clinical periodontal attachment level, crown height, gingival recession, radiographic alveolar bone levels, duration of orthodontic traction |
Duration: open exposure - 10.2 months (SD: 4.2); closed exposure - 13.2 months (SD: 8.5). Exposure and alignment of the PDCs have a small impact on periodontal health |
Smailiene et al. (2013) [42], Sweden |
Q-RCT, unilateral PDC |
Fixed appliances, open surgical approach, and free eruption |
Fixed appliances, ballista loop, and closed flap surgery |
Post-treatment status (radiological, periodontal, and intraoral examination), visual assessment of the color and shape of the crown, inclination, position in the dental arch, and function) of palatally impacted canines |
The post-treatment status of the palatally impacted and the adjacent teeth after the surgical-orthodontic treatment did not significantly differ between the groups treated with the two different surgical methods (open and closed). Both treatment methods can be considered acceptable for the treatment of palatally impacted canines |