Skip to main content
. 2022 May 10;40:101046. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101046

Table 1.

Summary of selected studies RCT.

Author, year of publication, country Design RCT Study period Procedure Population (N) PCI (N) MIDCAB (N) Follow-up Risk of bias
Diegeler et al. [2002]
Germany

Thiele et al. [2005]
Germany

Blazek et al. [2013]
Germany
Open label single center randomized controlled trial June 1997 – June 2001 MIDCAB under direct vision

PCI with BMS
220
110
110 30 days
6-months

5 years


10 years
Low


Low


Low
Thiele et al. [2009]
Germany

Blazek et al. [2015]
Germany
Open label single center randomized controlled trial January 2003 – October 2007 MIDCAB under direct vision

PCI with DES
130 65 65 30 days
1 year

7 years
Low


Low
Cisowski et al. [2002]
Poland
Open label single center randomized controlled trial 2000–2001 MIDCAB thoracoscopic assistance

PCI with BMS
100
50 50 30 days
6-months
1 year
Low
Drenth et al. [2002]
The Netherlands
Open label single center randomized controlled trial March 1997 – September 1999 MIDCAB under direct vision

PCI with BMS
102
51 51 30 days
6-months
Moderate
Kim et al. [2005]
South Korea
Open label single center randomized controlled trial January 2000 – December 2001 MIDCAB under direct vision and mini-sternotomy

PCI with BMS
100
50 50 30 days
1 year
Low
Reeves et al. [2004]
United Kingdom
Open label multicenter randomized controlled trial November 1999 – December 2001 MIDCAB under direct vision or thoracoscopic assistance

PCI with BMS
100
50 50 30 days
12 months
Low
Summary of selected cohort studies
Author, year of publication, country Design cohort Study period Procedure Population (N) PCI (N) MIDCAB (N) Follow-up Risk of bias
Benedetto et al. [2014]
United Kingdom
Retrospective single center prospective propensity score-matched comparison April 2001 - May 2013 MIDCAB under direct vision or thoracoscopic assistance

PCI with DES
1033 (before matching)
303 303 30 days
1 year
5 years
10 years
Moderate
Choi et al. [2019]
South Korea
Retrospective single center prospective propensity score-matched comparison September 2007 – June 2017 MIDCAB under direct vision

PCI with DES
154
77 77 3 years Moderate
Etienne et al. [2013]
Belgium
Retrospective multicenter study prospective propensity score-matched comparison 1997–2011 MIDCAB under direct vision

PCI with DES
456
196 260 30 days
5 years
Moderate
Iakovou et al. [2002]
United States of America
Retrospective single center prospective propensity score-matched comparison June 1996 – December 1999 MIDCAB under direct vision

PCI with BMS
560 441 119 30 days
1 year
Moderate
Li et al. [2021]
China
Retrospective single center prospective propensity score-matched comparison July 2007 –
November 2011
RA-MIDCAB

PCI with DES
719 (before matching) 108 108 4 years Moderate
Merkle et al. [2019]
Germany
Retrospective single center matched comparison 2006–2012 MIDCAB harvesting under direct vision or using thoracoscopic assistance

PCI with DES
206
100 106 1 year
6 years
10 years
Moderate
Shirai et al. [2004]
United States of America
Retrospective single center matched comparison February 1990 – October 1999 MIDCAB unknown technique

PCI with BMS
581 429 152 30 days
6 months
Moderate
Patel et al. [2020]
United States of America
Retrospective single center prospective propensity score-matched comparison January 2008 –December 2016 RA-MIDCAB

PCI with DES
531 (before matching) 158 158 9 years Moderate

Abbreviations: BMS: bare metal stent, DES: drug eluting stent, RA-MIDCAB: robotic assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention, RCT: randomized controlled trial.