Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 29;10(2):94–100. doi: 10.14791/btrt.2022.0003

Table 1. Clinical outcomes for OPG following RT.

Study Patients (n) OPG RT Total dose Definition of progression PFS OS
Only OPG
Tao et al. [11] 29 29 (100%) X-ray 54 Gy Radiologic assessment 10 yr 89% 10 yr 100%
Cappelli et al. [12] 53 53 (100%) X-ray 50–55 Gy Visual symptom 10 yr 66% 10 yr 83%
Radiologic assessment
Grabenbauer et al. [24] 25 25 (100%) X-ray 45–60 Gy Radiologic assessment 10 yr 69% 10 yr 94%
Combs et al. [15] 15 15 (100%) X-ray 52.2 Gy Radiologic assessment 5 yr 72% 5 yr 90%
Tsang et al. [9] 89 89 (100%) X-ray 54 Gy Radiologic assessment 10 yr 62%–68% 10 yr 92%–98%
Secondary malignancy
Acharya et al. [16] 41 41 (100%) X-ray 54 Gy Radiologic assessment 5 yr 84% -
Mixed OPG and other low-grade glioma
Marcus et al. [13] 81 37 (46%) X-ray 52.2 Gy Radiologic assessment 5 yr 83%, 8 yr 65% 5 yr 98%, 8 yr 82%
Oh et al. [4] 181 62 (34%) X-ray 54–57 Gy Neurologic symptom 8 yr 39% 8 yr 94%
Radiologic assessment
Raikar et al. [5] 17 6 (35%) X-ray 50–54 Gy Radiologic assessment 3 yr 69%, 10 yr 46% 10 yr 100%
Cherlow et al. [10] 85 37 (44%) X-ray 54 Gy Radiologic assessment 3 yr 77%, 5 yr 71% 3 yr 94%, 5 yr 93%
Greenberger et al. [25] 32 Unknown Proton 52.5 GyRBE Radiologic assessment 8 yr 83% 8 yr 100%
Indelicato et al. [14] 174 101 (58%) Proton 54 GyRBE Radiologic assessment 5 yr 88% 5 yr 93%

OPG, optic pathway glioma; RT, radiation therapy; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival. RBE, relative biological effectiveness