Skip to main content
. 2022 May 13;22:638. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08019-w

Table 2.

Results of the BaFAI

Factors identified as barriers Intervention (n = 24) (% of total) Control (n = 17) ((% of total)
Characteristics of the practice/innovation
 The online platform leaves enough room for me to make my own conclusions—compatibility 1 (4%) 1 (6%)
 The online platform leaves enough room to consider my patients related mental health needs – specificity 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 The online platform is a good starting point for my self- study – didactic flexibility/benefit 0 (0%) 1 (6%)
 Working according to the online platform is too time consuming – time investment 13 (54%) 10 (59%)
 The online platform does not fit into my ways of working at my practice—attractiveness 7 (29%) 6 (35%)
 The lay-out of this online platform makes it handy for use—attractiveness 2 (8%) 4 (23,5%)
Barriers deriving from the characteristics of the professionals
 I did not thoroughly use nor remember the online platform – training attitude 10 (42%) 10 (59%)
 I wish to know more about the online platform before I decide to apply it—innovation doubts 8 (33%) 10 (59%)
 I have problems changing my old routines. motivation and role 10 (42%) 10 (59%)
 I think parts of the online platform are incorrect perception knowledge 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 I have a general resistance to working according to protocols participation 3 (12,5%) 3 (18%)
 Fellow doctors (GPs) do not cooperate in applying the online platform—involvement 3 (12,5%) 7 (41%)
 Other doctors or assistants do not cooperate in applying the online platform—involvement 2 (8%) 4 (23,5%)
 Primary health care coordinators do not cooperate in applying the online platform—involvement 3 (12,5%) 4(23,5%)
 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform … because I am not trained to use online platforms – work style 2 (8%) 2 (12%)
Barriers due to patient characteristics
 Patients do not cooperate in applying the online platform readiness to change 8 (8%) 3 (18%)
 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform to patients due to ethnicity—characteristics 4 (17%) 4 (23,5%)
 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform to patients of low socio-economic background—financial situation 5 (21%) 2 (12%)
 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform to older patients (> 65 years old) age 6 (25%) 3 (18%)

 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform to patients that rarely come to the primary health care unit—number of patient

contacts

15 (62,5%) 6 (35%)
Barriers arising from the intervention context
 Working according to this online platform requires financial compensation 1 (4%) 1 (6%)
 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform if there is not enough supportive staff—support staff 3 (12,5%) 4 (23,5%)
 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform if the instruments needed are not available—equipment suitable for practice 17 (71%) 13 (76%)
 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform if physical spaces are missing (eg consultation office with computer)—location of facilities 16 (67%) 9 (53%)
 It is difficult to apply the ePrimaPrescribe platform if physical space is lacking (e.g. consulting room)- location of facilities 7 (29%) 9 (53%)

x2 Pearson = 162,15

Pr = 0.130

Fisher’s exact = 0.012