Summary of findings 5. Summary of findings table ‐ Therapeutic ibuprofen 800 mg compared to prophylactic ibuprofen 800 mg women having medical abortion before 14 weeks? gestation.
Therapeutic ibuprofen 800 mg compared to prophylactic ibuprofen 800 mg women having medical abortion before 14 weeks' gestation | ||||||
Patient or population: women having medical abortion before 14 weeks' gestation Setting: multiple clinics, USA Intervention: therapeutic ibuprofen 800 mg Comparison: prophylactic ibuprofen 800 mg | ||||||
Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | № of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Risk with prophylactic ibuprofen 800 mg | Risk with therapeutic ibuprofen 800 mg | |||||
Pain score | The mean pain score was 7.1 out of 10 | MD 0.2 out of 10 higher (0.41 lower to 0.81 higher) | ‐ | 228 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b | |
Gastrointestinal side effects (nausea and/or vomiting) | 378 per 1000 | 504 per 1000 (376 to 633) | OR 1.67 (0.99 to 2.83) | 228 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b | |
Gastrointestinal side effects (diarrhoea) ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
Complete abortion rate | 964 per 1000 | 974 per 1000 (892 to 994) | OR 1.42 (0.31 to 6.50) | 228 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b | |
Induction to expulsion interval ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
Unscheduled contact with care | 360 per 1000 | 367 per 1000 (253 to 499) | OR 1.03 (0.60 to 1.77) | 228 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b | |
Patient satisfaction with analgesia ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
Patient satisfaction with abortion care overall | 982 per 1000 | 966 per 1000 (831 to 994) | OR 0.52 (0.09 to 2.89) | 228 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b | |
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. | ||||||
See interactive version of this table: https://gdt.gradepro.org/presentations/#/isof/isof_question_revman_web_419478610033865921. |
a Downgraded 1 level for risk of bias: high risk of bias due to lack of blinding of outcomes assessors b Downgraded 1 level for imprecision: 95% confidence interval includes no effect.