Skip to main content
. 2022 May 12;5(5):e229655. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9655

Table 4. Sensitivity Analyses of Concordance Rates (by Percent Agreement) According to Treatment/Therapeutic Class and to Scan Availability.

Analysis No. % (95% CI)
Best response categories Dichotomized response, y/n
Unconfirmed Confirmeda Unconfirmed Confirmeda
According to therapy class
Anti–VEGF-containing 27 63 (42.4-80.6) 51.9 (31.9-71.3) 81.5 (61.9-93.7) 70.4 (49.8-86.2)
Chemotherapy 35 54.3 (36.6-71.2) 62.9 (44.9-78.5) 71.4 (53.7-85.4) 82.9 (66.4-93.4)
Targeted 23 65.2 (42.7-83.6) 43.5 (23.2-65.5) 78.3 (56.3-92.5) 56.5 (34.5-76.8)
PD-1/PD-L1-based 15 46.7 (21.3-73.4) 40 (16.3-67.7) 60 (32.3-83.7) 66.7 (38.4-88.2)
According to scan availability
All EHR-documented scans available 23 60.9 (38.5-80.3) 60.9 (38.5-80.3) 73.9 (51.6-89.8) 73.9 (51.6-89.8)
At least 1 EHR-documented scan unavailable 77 57.1 (45.4-68.4) 49.4 (37.8-61) 74.0 (62.8-83.4) 70.1 (58.6-80)

Abbreviations: EHR, electronic health record; PD-(L)1, programmed cell death-(ligand) 1; Targeted therapy, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and anti-EGFR antibody-based; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

a

Patients with an initial response, but without subsequent scan to confirm it, would be considered unconfirmed.