Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 22;14(9):1735. doi: 10.3390/nu14091735

Table 2.

Psychological evaluation of the sample.

HEW
n = 382
BIW
n = 74
Lesbian
n = 50
HEM
n = 236
BIM
n = 40
Gay
n = 48
H p
η2p
Post-Hoc
PHQ9 8.77 (4.84) 11.13 (5.02) 9.70 (4.75) 6.98 (4.49) 7.65 (4.55) 6.85 (3.90) 56.797 <0.001
0.067
BIW > HEW (p = 0.001)
HEW > HEM (p < 0.001)
BIW > HEM (p < 0.001)
BIW > BIM (p = 0.002)
BIW > Gay (p < 0.001)
EAT26 tot 9.14 (10.17) 12.74 (13.19) 10.94 (9.25) 5.26 (4.57) 4.22 (3.67) 7.65 (4.57) 73.780 <0.001
0.073
HEW > HEM (p < 0.001)
HEM > BIM (p = 0.011)
BIW > HEM (p < 0.001)
BIW > BIM (p < 0.001)
Lesbian > HEM (p < 0.001)
FPS 3.57 (0.47) 3.82 (0.39) 3.73 (0.36) 3.52 (0.60) 3.90 (0.55) 4.36 (0.32) 112.111 <0.001
0.144
BIW > HEW (p = 0.003)
BIW > HEM (p < 0.001)
BIM > HEW (p = 0.002)
Gay > HEW (p < 0.001)
Gay > BIW (p < 0.001)
Gay > Lesbian (p < 0.001)
Gay > HEM (p < 0.001)
Gay > BIM (p < 0.001)
BAOP 19.72 (3.73) 20.68 (3.64) 20.42 (4.08) 20.37 (4.46) 20.77 (1.94) 18.69 (2.36) 22.251 0.014
0.017
Gay < HEM (p = 0.004)

HEW: heterosexual women; BIW: bisexual women; HEM: heterosexual men; BIM: bisexual men; PHQ9: physical health questionnaire; EAT: eating attitude test; FPS: fat phobia scale, BAOP: beliefs about obese person. H: Kruskal–Wallis test for the evaluation of the distribution of variables with Pairwise Comparisons with Bonferroni correction.