Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 27;14(9):2188. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092188

Table 2.

Comparison of histopathological characteristics and molecular patterns of EEC without lymph node involvement (n = 12) and with lymph node involvement (n = 16), Institut Bergonie, 2010–2017.

Pathological Characteristics EEC with Negative Lymph Nodes (n = 12) EEC with Positive Lymph Nodes (n = 16)
n (%) Mean (SD) n (%) Mean (SD) p-Value 1
Tumoral size 46.8 (22.5) 50.1 (25.9) 0.7
Histological grade 0.9
Low grade (grade 1 and grade 2) 3 (25.0) 5 (31.2)
High grade (grade 3) 9 (75.0) 11 (68.8)
Myometrial invasion 0.9
≤50% 4 (33.3) 6 (37.5)
>50% 8 (66.7) 10 (62.5)
Angioinvasion 0.013
Absence 9 (75.0) 3 (18.8)
Non-substantial 1 (8.3) 4 (25.0)
Substantial 2 (16.7) 9 (56.2)
Number of angioinvasion
(if presence of angioinvasion)
3.9 (9.4) 7.2 (8.4) 0.3
Stromal Reaction 0.12
Presence 5 (41.7) 12 (75.0)
Absence 7 (58.3) 4 (25.0)
MELF pattern 0.07
Presence 3 (25.0) 10 (62.5)
Absence 9 (75.0) 6 (37.5)
Inflammatory infiltration 0.9
Presence 5 (41.7) 6 (37.5)
Absence 7 (58.3) 10 (62.5)
Peri nervous invasion 0.4
Presence 1 (8.3) 4 (25.0)
Absence 11 (91.7) 12 (75.0)
Molecular classification group (TCGA) 0.06
Ultramutated (POLE mutation) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Hypermutated (MSI) 4 (33.3) 9 (56.2)
Serous-like (TP53 mutation) 0 (0.0) 3 (18.8)
Non specific molecular profile 8 (66.7) 4 (25.0)
CTNNB1 mutation 0.1
Pathogenic mutation 5 (41.7) 2 (12.5)
No pathogenic mutation 7 (58.3) 14 (87.5)

1 Fisher’s exact test; Two Sample t-test.