Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 21;12(9):1081. doi: 10.3390/ani12091081

Table 1.

Maned wolves’ roar-bark sequences recorded passively at the Serra da Canastra National Park. At the top is the complete dataset (all recorders) and at the bottom the subsample of the 5 common recording sites used in all periods (only nights in which all 5 were active).

All Recorders Periods: Non-Reproductive Mating Gestation Parturition Initial Parental Care
Nights recorded 37 53 82 57 31
Sequences 67 202 93 104 49
Interactive sequences 4 24 10 9 11
Average recorders 6.3 ± 1.2 12.4 ± 1.0 12.1 ± 1.2 11.8 ± 1.6 12 ± 0
Sequences by night by recorder 0.286 ± 0.522 0.303 ± 0.402 0.093 ± 0.120 0.154 ± 0.215 0.132 ± 0.362
Interactive sequences by night by recorder 0.014 ± 0.057 0.036 ± 0.087 0.011 ± 0.036 0.014 ± 0.044 0.030 ± 0.063
% of interactive sequences 2.4 ± 6.9% 14.8 ± 29.0% 10.5 ± 26.8% 14.1 ± 32.5% 33.1 ± 44.4%
Nights with sequences 16 38 44 32 16
% of nights with sequences 43.2% 71.7% 53.7% 56.1% 51.6%
Nights with interactive sequences 2 13 8 6 7
% of nights with interactive sequences 5.4% 24.5% 9.8% 10.5% 22.6%
Five Recorders Periods: Non-Reproductive Mating Gestation Parturition Initial Parental Care
Nights recorded 21 50 69 59 21
Sequences 46 76 36 64 11
Interactive sequences 4 12 1 10 6
Sequences by night 2.190 ± 3.669 1.520 ± 2.801 0.522 ± 1.001 1.085 ± 3.218 0.524 ± 0.814
Interactive sequences by night 0.190 ± 0.602 0.240 ± 0.916 0.014 ± 0.120 0.169 ± 0.530 0.286 ± 0.644
% of interactive sequences 4.2 ± 10.4% 14.5 ± 31.5% 1.2 ± 5.5% 21.0 ± 38.8% 45.8 ± 50.2%
Nights with sequences 11 22 21 24 8
% of nights with sequences 52.4% 44.0% 30.4% 40.7% 38.1%
Nights with interactive sequences 2 6 1 4 4
% of nights with interactive sequences 9.5% 12.0% 1.4% 6.8% 19.0%