Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 29;19(9):5464. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095464

Table 2.

Relationship between the COVID-19 vaccination psychological experience score of participants and the willingness to uptake booster vaccines.

Model Number of Surveys Tendency to Hesitate Rate (%, 95%CI) Unadjusted Variable Adjusted Variable
OR 95%CI OR 95%CI
Negative
psychological
experience
model
Q1 7169 16.1 (15.3~17.0) 1.000 1.000
Q2 9060 4.1 (3.7~4.5) 4.495 3.981~5.075 2.474 2.154~2.843
Q3 4560 1.9 (1.5~2.3) 10.012 8.015~12.506 3.935 3.093~5.006
Q4 5966 0.6 (0.4~0.8) 31.701 22.708~44.255 8.871 6.240~12.612
Positive
psychological
experience
model
Q1 1,0750 9.6 (9.0~10.1) 1.000 1.000
Q2 3822 5.3 (4.6~6.1) 1.885 1.615~2.201 1.931 1.630~2.288
Q3 6919 4.2 (3.7~4.6) 2.439 2.133~2.789 2.460 2.111~2.867
Q4 5264 2.4 (2.0~2.8) 4.371 3.619~5.278 3.933 3.176~4.871

We categorized the score of COVID-19 vaccination negative psychological experience by quartiles as Q1 (4–13 points), Q2 (14–16 points), Q3 (17–18 points), and Q4 (19–20 points), and the score of COVID-19 vaccination positive psychological experience by quartiles as Q1 (3–9 points), Q2 (10–10 points), Q3 (11–12 points), and Q4 (13–15 points).We adjusted age, sex, educational status, ethnic groups, religion, marital status, subjective social status in China, subjective social status in one’s community, body mass index, chronic condition, smoking status, drinking status, health behaviors, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, risk of COVID-19 infection, curability of COVID-19, channel of vaccine information, vaccine conspiracy beliefs, trust in doctors, trust in developers, and convenient vaccination.CI, confidence interval. OR, odds ratios.