The Transcription Regulator YgeK Affects Biofilm Formation and Environmental Stress Resistance in Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli

Abstract

Simple Summary

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is the pathogen responsible for colibacillosis in poultry. Transcriptional regulator ygeK has been shown to decrease APEC’s flagellar formation ability, bacterial motility ability, serum sensitivity, and adhesion ability. However, we did not study the effects of ygeK on biofilm formation and environmental stress resistance in APEC. In this study, we investigated ygeK in APEC biofilm formation and bacterial resistance to different environmental stresses. We also analyzed the multi-level regulation of ygeK in APEC and investigated associations between differentially expressed proteins and key ygeK targets. This work provides a basis for further analysis of APEC pathogenesis mechanisms.

Abstract

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is one of the most common pathogens in poultry and a potential gene source of human extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC), leading to serious economic losses in the poultry industry and public health concerns. Exploring the pathogenic mechanisms underpinning APEC and the identification of new targets for disease prevention and treatment are warranted. YgeK is a transcriptional regulator in APEC and is localized to the type III secretion system 2 of E. coli. In our previous work, the transcription factor ygeK significantly affected APEC flagella formation, bacterial motility, serum sensitivity, adhesion, and virulence. To further explore ygeK functions, we evaluated its influence on APEC biofilm formation and resistance to environmental stress. Our results showed that ygeK inactivation decreased biofilm formation and reduced bacterial resistance to environmental stresses, including acid and oxidative stress. In addition, the multi-level regulation of ygeK in APEC was analyzed using proteomics, and associations between differentially expressed proteins and the key targets of ygeK were investigated. Overall, we identified ygeK’s new function in APEC. These have led us to better understand the transcriptional regulatory ygeK and provide new clues about the pathogenicity of APEC.

1. Introduction

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is a type of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) that causes colibacillosis in poultry, leading to significant economic losses to the poultry industry [1]. Due to its diverse serotypes and complex virulence factors, no effective vaccines are available against APEC [2]. In addition, APEC is becoming increasingly resistant to widespread antibiotic use; even the polymyxin resistance gene mcr-1 has begun to appear in clinical APEC isolates, with life-threatening risks on a global scale [3,4,5]. Gene cluster comparisons of animal and human mcr-resistant strains suggest that bacteria carrying mcr genes are potentially zoonotic. Therefore, exploring pathogenic mechanisms in APEC is important and will promote the development of effective vaccines or new drug targets to control this infection.

Biofilms are multicellular bacterial aggregates bound by a polymeric matrix consisting of complex mixtures of extracellular polysaccharides, proteins, and DNA [6,7]. These structures allow bacteria to tolerate a variety of environmental pressures [7,8]. Many bacterial species form complex and diverse biofilms. Researchers have concentrated on exploring the formation mechanism of biofilms and looking for inhibitory strategies for biofilm formation [9,10]. In APEC, several transcription regulators regulate bacterial biofilm formation, e.g., deletion of the two-component system basSR inhibits in vitro APEC biofilm formation and decreases bacterial virulence and colonization in vivo [11]. PhoP is a transcriptional regulator in the two-component phoP/phoQ regulatory system; it up-regulates APEC biofilm formation and is associated with changes in bacterial drug resistance and cell-membrane-related properties [12]. McbR increases APEC biofilm formation by up-regulating transcription of the biofilm-associated genes, bcsA, fliC, wcaF, and fimA, and also affects oxidative responses by regulating transcription of the yciGFE operon [13]. Oxidative stress is one of the stress environments that bacteria encounter when they infect the host. In APEC, some genes have been reported to be associated with environmental stress (such as acid, alkali, and oxidative stress). Understanding bacterial resistance to environmental stress will help further explore bacterial survival mechanisms.

YgeK was identified as a regulator of gene expression in enterohemorrhagic E. coli [14,15]. We previously showed that ygeK inactivation in AE81 reduced several bacterial functions, including flagella formation, motility, bactericidal activity, and adhesion [16]. Studies reported that flagella are more than a locomotive organelle for E. coli, they are also critical for biofilm formation [17]. However, we did not study the effects of ygeK on biofilm formation in APEC. In this study, we investigated ygeK in APEC biofilm formation and bacterial resistance to different environmental stresses. We also analyzed the multi-level regulation of ygeK in APEC and investigated associations between differentially expressed proteins and key ygeK targets. This work provides a basis for further analysis of APEC pathogenesis mechanisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Wild-Type, Mutant, and Complement Strains

The wild-type strain, AE81, was isolated from the lung of a dead, septicemic chicken with suspected colibacillosis in Anhui, China [18]. The mutant, AE81ΔygeK, and complemented strain, AE81ΔygeK-pCmygeK, were constructed in our previous study [16]. Where necessary, we supplemented chloramphenicol (30 µg/mL) to lysogeny broth solid medium.

2.2. Crystal Violet (CV) Staining of Biofilms

AE81, AE81ΔygeK, and AE81ΔygeK-pCmygeK cultures were diluted to OD₆₀₀ = 0.03 and incubated at 28 °C for 72 h. Stationary phase cultures were washed three times in sterile phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and air-dried. Then, 100% methanol was added to immobilize biofilm-forming cells for 5 min and a 0.1% (w/v) CV solution was added to stain cells for 15 min. Excess stain was rinsed away with distilled water and cells were re-air-dried. The remaining CV in the growth tube was dissolved in 33% glacial acetic acid (Sanggong, Shanghai, China) and the solution read at 492 nm on a Micro Elisa microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) [19]. Experiments were performed three times.

2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

We incubated 1 mL bacterial suspensions (OD₆₀₀ = 1.0) on sterile glass coverslips (diameter = 10 mm) in 12-well plates at 37 °C for 24 h. The next day, the coverslip was washed three times in PBS and glutaraldehyde (2.5%) was added to the wells. After incubation at 4 °C for 10 h, wells were washed three times in PBS and treated with 1% osmic acid for 5 h. Cells were then dehydrated in 30, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100% ethyl alcohol. Cells were then observed using field SEM (Hitachi S-4800, Chiyotaku, Japan).

2.4. Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂) Stress Assays

Overnight AE81, AE81ΔygeK, and AE81ΔygeK-pCmygeK cultures were diluted to OD₆₀₀ = 0.03 in fresh lysogeny broth (LB) broth. Then, 10 µL culture aliquots were spotted onto LB agar plates containing 0.8 mM H₂O₂ and allowed to air dry [13]. The plates were incubated at 37 °C over night, after which colonies were photographed the next day. Experiments were performed three times.

2.5. Acid Resistance Assays

AE81, AE81ΔygeK, and AE81ΔygeK-pCmygeK cultures were grown to logarithmic phase (OD₆₀₀ = 1.0) then centrifuged and resuspended in PBS. The pH of LB medium was adjusted with Tris-HCl (100 mmol/L, pH 10.0) to different acid pH levels (pH = 1, pH = 2, pH = 3). Bacteria were cultured in LB at different pH’s at 37 °C for 30 min and then aliquots were spotted onto LB agar plates and incubated overnight. The next day, colonies were counted. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.6. iTRAQ-Based Quantitative Proteomic Analysis

The sequenced strains were the original, AE81, and the deletion strain, AE81ΔygeK. Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) proteomic services were provided by Shenzhen Huada Gene Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, China). iTRAQ data were quantified by IQuant [20] software independently developed by BGI, which integrates the Mascot Percolator algorithm [21]. A 1% false-positive rate (FDR) filtering (PSM-level FDR ≤ 0.01) step at the peptide-spectrum match level was performed to obtain spectrum and peptide lists for identification, then proteins were assembled using peptides, and protein groups were generated. Proteins were filtered again using picked protein FDR [22] with FDR at 1% at the protein level (protein-level FDR ≤ 0.01) to control the false positive rate. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Pathway (KEGG-PATH) of differentially expressed proteins was to compare the identified proteins with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database to derive corresponding classification pathway results.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

SPSS (v19.0) software was used to analyze data. Between AE81 and AE81ΔygeK groups, or AE81ΔygeK and AE81ΔygeK-pCmygeK groups, paired t-tests were used for statistical comparisons. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. YgeK Inactivation Decreases Biofilm Formation in AE81 Strains

The influence of ygeK inactivation on biofilm formation was evaluated in vitro. AE81 and AE81ΔygeK-pCmygeK strains formed intact biofilms on glass tubes and liquid surfaces, but the AE81ΔygeK strain generated almost none (Figure 1A). Biofilms were stained in 0.1% crystal violet, dissolved in 33% glacial acetic acid, and read at 492 nm (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

(A) Biofilms formed on tubes by AE81, AE81ΔygeK, and AE81ΔygeK-pCmygeK strains. (B) Measurement of biofilm mass. Values are average of three independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviation (*** p < 0.001).

3.2. Biofilm Observations using SEM

AE81 biofilm morphology under SEM was compact; the outer layer had a thick extracellular matrix and surface bacteria were aggregated to form a dense regional surface layer. YgeK deletion in AE81 resulted in thin membranous structures and large bacterial shapes in the biofilm, whereas AE81ΔygeK-pCmygeK biofilms were more compact than AE81ΔygeK (Figure 2). Inactivation of ygeK resulted in reduced ability of APEC to form biofilms.

Figure 2.

Biofilm structures were observed by scanning electron microscopy (×7000 magnification).

3.3. YgeK Influences APEC Resistance to H₂O₂

In co-cultured bacteria with H₂O₂ at different dilutions (10⁻¹, 10⁻², 10⁻³, 10⁻⁴, and 10⁻⁵), AE81, AE81ΔygeK, and AE81ΔygeK-pCmygeK strains were observed. However, at 10⁻⁵, only the AE81 strain was observed. As shown (Figure 3), AE81ΔygeK colony numbers were reduced when compared with AE81 and AE81ΔygeK-pCmygeK, suggesting inactivation of ygeK led to APEC’s response to H₂O₂ stress.

Figure 3.

Hydrogen peroxide sensitivity in AE81, AE81ΔygeK, and AE81ΔygeK-pCmygeKI strains.

3.4. YgeK Influences APEC Acid Resistance

Acid resistance assays are often performed to evaluate a pathogen’s resistance to acid stress environments [23,24]. As shown (Figure 4), ygeK inactivation reduced acid resistance significantly in medium at different pH values (pH 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0).

Figure 4.

AE81, AE81ΔygeK, and AE81ΔygeK-pCmygeK resistance to different pH values (pH = 1.0, 2.0, 3.0). Values are average of three independent experiments (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, ns: no significance).

3.5. Screening Differentially Expressed Proteins in AE81 and AE81ΔygeK Strains

In total, 91 significant differentially expressed proteins were identified using fold change > 1.2 and Q-value < 0.05 criteria, of which 26 proteins were significantly up-regulated and 65 significantly down-regulated (Figure 5). The most up-regulated protein was YhaK, which belonged to the Pirin family. The AE81ΔygeK/AE81 ratio was 10. The most down-regulated protein was AdiC which was an arginine: agmatine antiporter (Table S1).

Figure 5.

Differentially expressed protein volcano graph. The X-axis is the protein difference multiple (take log2) and the Y-axis is the corresponding −log10 (Q-value).

3.6. KEGG Pathway Annotation Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins

KEGG pathway annotation analyses showed that differentially expressed proteins were mainly enriched in microbial metabolism in diverse environments, two-component systems, flagellar assembly, bacterial chemotaxis, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, and pyrimidine metabolism, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, and fructose and mannose metabolism (Figure 6). Differentially expressed proteins were most prevalent in microbial metabolism in diverse environments, two-component systems, bacterial chemotaxis, and flagellar assembly (Figure 7).

Figure 6.

Up-regulated and down-regulated differentially expressed protein pathway classification.

Figure 7.

Enrichment pathways show significant differentially expressed proteins.

4. Discussion

APEC is reportedly a potential zoonotic pathogen that transfers virulence and resistance genes to human ExPEC; therefore, developing effective vaccines or new drug targets is imperative [25]. In our previous study, ygeK significantly affected APEC flagella formation, bacterial motility, serum sensitivity, adhesion, and virulence via different functional pathways [16]. Here, we report that inactivation of the transcriptional activator ygeK decreased biofilm formation and reduced bacterial resistance to acid and oxidative stresses.

Biofilm formation is a protected growth mode that enables pathogen survival in hostile environments [26,27]. Several transcriptional regulators are involved in APEC biofilm formation, including basSR, phoP, mcbR, and cpxA [11,12,13,28]. In bacteria, common regulators, extracellular polymeric production, and biofilm heterogeneity are all central responses and contributors to oxidative stress [29]. For example, Salmonella biofilms cultured in vitro are also tolerant to H₂O₂ [30]. In APEC, inactivation of ibeA decreased biofilm formation and ibeA can confer increased H₂O₂ resistance to APEC [31,32]. In our study, ygeK inactivation decreased biofilm formation and reduced oxidative responses in APEC. Inactivation of mcbR increased APEC’s biofilm formation but decreased APEC’s resistance to H₂O₂ stress [13]. Deletion of waaL increased biofilm formation and reduced resistance to oxidative and alkali environmental stress [33]. Therefore, we hypothesize that these genes affecting biofilm formation and H₂O₂ resistance are involved in different pathways. H₂O₂ readily crosses bacterial membranes and enters the cytoplasm where it forms hydroxyl radicals that damage DNA, proteins, and lipid membranes [31]. In APEC, oxidative responses exert important roles during pathogenic processes in hosts. We provide a greater understanding of how APEC is recalcitrant to oxidative stress during chronic infection.

Acid stress is also a typical environmental stress [34]. Microorganisms have developed sophisticated physiological and molecular mechanisms to survive under acid stresses such as the sophisticated acid-resistant systems of E. coli. One acid-resistant system, composed of Glutaminease YbaS and the Glu-GABA antiporter GadC, helps E. coli survive in extremely acid environments [35,36,37]. There are also other factors influencing acid stress. For example, deletion of yfcO decreased survival under acidic stress conditions [38]. The mutation of ybjX decreased resistance to environmental stress (alkaline and acid) [23]. Without ygeK, the acid resistance of APEC decreased, with our proteomics data showing that GadC protein expression was down-regulated, indicating ygeK may affect APEC mediated acid resistance via GadC. This result highlights how ygeK has a role in developing resistance to acid stress.

In this study, we reported that deletion of ygeK decreased biofilm formation ability and reduced resistance to environmental stress. When combined with our previous findings, we hypothesize that ygeK plays a vital function in APEC processes. In addition, we analyzed ygeK function in APEC using proteomics, which not only enriches the APEC network but also unravels APEC pathogenic mechanisms for the generation of alternative control strategies for APEC virulence. In the future, substrate interaction with ygeK should be investigated to further investigate the mechanism.

5. Conclusions

This study proved that transcriptional regulator ygeK influences APEC biofilm formation, resistance to H₂O₂, and acid resistance. In addition, we provide a greater understanding of how APEC is recalcitrant to oxidative stress during chronic infection, highlight how ygeK has a role in developing resistance to acid stress, and elucidate its regulatory network. These results define the critical role of ygeK in APEC, guiding the search for new drug targets and vaccines.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani12091160/s1, Table S1: The differentially expressed proteins between AE81 and AE81ΔygeK.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.X. and D.F.; methodology, M.X. and D.F.; software, J.H.; validation, M.X. and D.F. and J.H.; formal analysis, J.H.; investigation, Y.S.; resources, K.Q.; data curation, X.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.X.; writing—review and editing, J.T. and X.S.; visualization, M.X. and D.F.; supervision, J.T. and Y.S.; project administration, Y.S.; funding acquisition, M.X. and K.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable. This study did not involve humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

iTRAQ-based proteomic sequencing data were deposited into the iProX integrated proteome resources with Project ID IPX0004369000.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772707) and Jinling Institute of Technology Scientific research start-up fund for high-end talents (jit-b-202154), and “The APC was funded by a Jinling Institute of Technology Scientific research start-up fund for high-end talents (jit-b-202154).