Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 27;11(9):2447. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092447

Table 2.

Comparison between score and virological and immunological factors.

Statistics p-Value
Time to HIV diagnosis (y) −0.155 0.309
CD4+ T-cell count at diagnosis (cell/mmc) −0.402 0.012
CD4+ T-cell count at diagnosis (%) −0.380 0.020
CD4+ T-cell count last determination (cell/mmc) −0.386 0.009
CD4+ T-cell count last determination (%) −0.480 0.001
Clinical progression to AIDS <0.001
no 8.8 (1.1)
yes 12.9 (2)
Development of resistance to ART 0.451
no 9.8 (2.1)
yes 10.4 (2.7)
HIV-RNA levels at diagnosis (cp/mL) −0.116 0.502
HIV-RNA levels last determination (cp/mL) 0.010 0.949
HIV-RNA levels last determination (cp/mL) 0.949
<20 cp/mL 9.9 (2.3)
>20 cp/mL 10 (2.3)
Time to beginning of ART −0.182 0.226
Current use of protease inhibitors 0.101
no 9.8 (2.2)
yes 11.5 (2.7)
Combination of ART with booster (ritonavir or cobicistat) 0.827
no 10.1 (2.4)
yes 9.9 (2.4)
Virologic response to ART 0.690
<20 copies/mL 9.7 (2.2)
20–50 copies/mL 10.1 (2.3)
50–200 copies/mL 11.5 (3.5)
>200 copies/mL 10.7 (2.9)
Immunologic response to ART 0.035 *
optimal 9.3 (1.8)
acceptable 10.6 (2.6)
not acceptable 12.3 (2.9)
ART discontinuation 0.536
no 10.2 (2.4)
yes 9.7 (2.3)
IL-6 0.289 0.152
PCR −0.247 0.224
VES 0.194 0.354
FBG −0.053 0.789

Statistics: Pearson’s r or mean (SD). Abbreviations: HIV, Human immunodeficiency virus; ART, antiretroviral therapy; IL-6, interleukin-6; PCR, reactive C protein; VES, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FBG, fibrinogen. * only the comparison between “optimal” and “not acceptable” was statistically significant with a p = 0.040, by Dunnett correction using “not acceptable” as the reference category.