Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;12(9):1169. doi: 10.3390/ani12091169

Table 8.

Differentially abundant serum proteins between horses with equine squamous gastric disease (ESGD) (n = 6) and equine glandular gastric disease (EGGD) (n = 6). Columns indicate the accession number obtained from UniProt database, protein name, mean and SD abundances of EGGD and ESGD groups, Log2(FC) between ESGD and EGGD groups, and p-value derived from Kruskal–Wallis analysis.

Accession (UniProt) Protein Name Mean EGGD Mean ESGD Log2(FC) p-Value Regulation in EGSD
F6Z5L1 Complement subcomponent C1r 0.68 ± 0.29 0.93 ± 0.31 0.44 0.041 UP
A0A3Q2KTQ9 Actin cytoplasmic 1 0.87 ± 0.11 1.14 ± 0.19 0.38 0.041 UP
F6PVG3 EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 1 0.92 ± 0.11 1.14 ± 0.16 0.30 0.041 UP
F7CSL8 Alpha-1-antiproteinase 2-like 0.94 ± 0.15 1.12 ± 0.12 0.24 0.041 UP
Q95M34 Immunoglobulin gamma 1 heavy chain constant region (Fragment) 0.86 ± 0.07 0.99 ± 0.08 0.19 0.028 UP
F7BUV8 Adiponectin A 0.96 ± 0.08 1.06 ± 0.08 0.15 0.041 UP
F6ZR63 Complement factor H 0.87 ± 0.06 0.95 ± 0.04 0.11 0.028 UP
F7C450 Alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein 0.95 ± 0.11 0.85 ± 0.08 −0.16 0.040 DOWN

SD: standard deviation; EGGD: equine glandular gastric disease; ESGD: equine squamous gastric disease; FC: fold change.