Table 3.
Items 2 | Se, mg/kg | Pros, % |
Liver, mg/kg | Kidney, mg/kg | Pancreas, mg/kg | Breast Muscles, mg/kg | Thigh Muscle, mg/kg | Serum, mg/L |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I-Se | 0.2 | 0 | 0.62 b | 0.70 | 0.21 c | 0.16 b | 0.16 c | 0.12 b |
O-Se | 0.2 | 0 | 0.79 a | 0.72 | 0.39 b | 0.38 a | 0.33 a | 0.12 b |
I-Se + pros | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.75 a | 0.75 | 0.18 c | 0.16 b | 0.26 b | 0.19 a |
O-Se + pros | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.80 a | 0.61 | 0.62 a | 0.34 a | 0.34 a | 0.12 b |
SEM | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 | ||
Main effect means 3 | ||||||||
Se-S | Inorganic | 0.68 b | 0.72 | 0.20 b | 0.16 b | 0.21 b | 0.15 a | |
Organic | 0.79 a | 0.68 | 0.49 a | 0.36 a | 0.33 a | 0.12 b | ||
SEM | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | ||
Pros | 0 | 0.70 b | 0.71 | 0.30 b | 0.28 | 0.24 b | 0.12 b | |
0.5 | 0.78 a | 0.70 | 0.37 a | 0.25 | 0.30 a | 0.16 a | ||
SEM | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | ||
p-value | ||||||||
Treatment | 0.004 | 0.236 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.007 | ||
Se-S | 0.004 | 0.160 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.040 | ||
Pros | 0.041 | 0.457 | 0.006 | 0.202 | 0.002 | 0.037 | ||
Se-S × Pros 4 | 0.094 | 0.101 | 0.001 | 0.367 | 0.010 | 0.022 |
1 Data are means with the SEM derived from ANOVA error mean square for n = 10. 2 I-Se, basal diet containing 0.2 mg/kg sodium selenite; O-Se, basal diet containing 0.2 mg/kg selenium yeast; I-Se + pros, basal diet containing 0.2 mg/kg sodium selenite and 0.5% probiotics; O-Se + pros, basal diet containing 0.2 mg/kg selenium yeast and 0.5% probiotics. 3 Se-S, Main effect of selenium source; Pros, Main effect of probiotics; Se-S + Pros, Main effect of selenium source plus probiotics. 4 Interaction between Se source and probiotics level. a,b,c Means within the same row having different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).