Table 3. Effect of environmental conditions on seedling emergence percentage (EP) and emergence index (EI) of 10 alfalfa seed lots.
| Seed lot | Control | Water stress | Salinity stress | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP (%) | EI | EP (%) | EI | EP (%) | EI | |
| 1 | 93.33 ± 2.40 Aa | 7.15 ± 0.85 Aa | 42.00 ± 2.00 Bab | 1.64 ± 0.20 Ba | 41.33 ± 4.67 Ba | 1.38 ± 0.17 Ba |
| 2 | 74.67 ± 7.68 Ab | 4.25 ± 0.70 Abc | 36.67 ± 0.67 Bb | 1.36 ± 0.11 Ba | 27.33 ± 2.67 Bb | 0.87 ± 0.07 Bcd |
| 3 | 54.67 ± 2.67 Ac | 2.73 ± 0.46 Ac | 23.33 ± 2.40 Bc | 0.78 ± 0.06 Bb | 16.67 ± 1.76 Bc | 0.48 ± 0.03 Bd |
| 4 | 90.00 ± 5.29 Aab | 5.66 ± 0.74 Aab | 42.67 ± 3.53 Bab | 1.85 ± 0.31 Ba | 36.00 ± 3.06 Bab | 1.34 ± 0.19 Bab |
| 5 | 85.33 ± 5.46 Aab | 5.25 ± 0.39 Aab | 46.00 ± 3.06 Ba | 1.86 ± 0.13 Ba | 32.00 ± 1.16 Cab | 1.12 ± 0.02 Babc |
| 6 | 90.67 ± 3.33Aa | 6.49 ± 0.86 Aa | 42.67 ± 2.67 Bab | 1.90 ± 0.20 Ba | 34.67 ± 3.53 Bab | 1.40 ± 0.16 Ba |
| 7 | 87.33 ± 1.76 Aab | 5.57 ± 0.23 Aab | 38.67 ± 2.91 Bab | 1.48 ± 0.01 Ba | 37.33 ± 2.40 Bab | 1.30 ± 0.11 Bab |
| 8 | 81.33 ± 7.33 Aab | 4.02 ± 0.50 Abc | 46.00 ± 4.00 Ba | 1.63 ± 0.25 Ba | 29.33 ± 4.06 Bb | 0.93 ± 0.07 Bbc |
| 9 | 88.00 ± 4.00 Aab | 5.44 ± 0.42 Aab | 40.67 ± 2.91 Bab | 1.54 ± 0.07 Ba | 28.00 ± 2.31 Cb | 0.94 ± 0.12 Bbc |
| 10 | 88.67 ± 3.33 Aab | 5.70 ± 0.62 Aab | 43.33 ± 1.33 Bab | 1.69 ± 0.11 Ba | 32.67 ± 3.71 Bab | 1.15 ± 0.21 Babc |
| Source of variation | DF | EP | EI | |||
| Chisq | P | Chisq | P | |||
| Seed lot (SL) | 9 | 109.933 | <0.001 | 137.120 | <0.001 | |
| Environmental conditions (EC) | 2 | 73.432 | <0.001 | 182.878 | <0.001 | |
| SL × EC | 18 | 36.683 | 0.006 | 64.685 | <0.001 | |
Note:
Different uppercase indicated significant difference among different stress treatments for given seed lot at the 0.05 level (P < 0.05), different lowercase indicated significant difference among different seed lots for given stress treatment at the 0.05 level (P < 0.05). The effect of seed lot and environmental conditions on seedling emergence percentage and emergence index were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. Three replications for each treatment of each seed lot. Duncan’s test was used to compare means when significant differences were found.