TABLE 3.

Cluster pairs that were found to be associated with significant connectivity changes between both interventions, during the EAT paradigm.

Cluster size (mm3)	MNI coordinates of peak (x y z)	Anatomical region	Cluster size (mm3)	MNI coordinates of peak (x y z)	Anatomical region	T (probiotic—placebo)	FDR
756	−21 69 15	Frontal pole	1,134	57 24 21	Caudal area 45	−4.51	0.013
3,402	42 9 30	Caudal ventrolateral area 6	1,107	−18 −93 −6	Occipital polar cortex	−4.18	0.027
756	−21 69 15	Frontal pole	3,051	54 21 30	Inferior frontal junction	−3.85	0.030
756	−21 69 15	Frontal pole	1,107	51 30 21	Inferior frontal sulcus	−3.46	0.047
945	51 −42 9	Caudoposterior superior temporal sulcus	594	−48 −51 9	Caudoposterior superior temporal sulcus	−3.98	0.044

BNA, Brainnetome atlas; EAT, emotional attention task; FDR, false discovery rate; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; ROI, region of interest. None of these sub-clusters was among the predefined ROIs. Four of those sub-cluster belonged to the same larger cluster spanning over several BNA regions (italic).