Table 5.

Parents of the progenies, number of the genotypes evaluated from each progeny, number of the genotypes selected using SI1 and SI2, and the ratio of selected individuals to the total population (%).

	Progenies	No of Genotypes	SI1	%	SI2	%
G07	TOTAL	520	77	15	69	13
	“9-67”	21	2	10	2	10
	“Arbequina”	20	4	20	4	20
	“Blanqueta”	21	4	19	4	19
	“Canetera”	20	7	35	5	25
	“Chalkidiki”	20	5	25	5	25
	“Changlot Real”	21	3	14	2	10
	“Chorruo de Castro del Río”	21	-	-	-	-
	“Empeltre”	21	3	14	3	14
	“Frantoio”	21	1	5	1	5
	“Hojiblanca”	20	5	25	4	20
	“Koroneiki”	18	3	17	3	17
	“Leccino”	15	1	7	1	7
	“Lechín de Granada”	18	-	-	-	-
	“Lechín de Sevilla”	21	1	5	1	5
	“Manzanilla de Sevilla”	20	8	40	8	40
	“Manzanilla del Piquito”	21	2	10	2	10
	“Meski”	18	-	-	-	-
	“Morona”	21	3	14	2	10
	“Negrillo de Arjona”	20	1	5	1	5
	“Ocal”	21	3	14	3	14
	“Sikitita”	19	2	11	2	11
	“Picual”	20	4	20	3	15
	“Picudo”	21	3	14	2	10
	“Tanche”	20	2	10	3	15
	“Toffahi”	20	6	30	4	20
	“Trylia”	21	4	19	4	19
G14	TOTAL	1048	156	15	145	14
	“Acebuchera”	76	9	12	9	12
	“Aloreña de Iznalloz”	67	9	13	7	10
	“Askal”	96	35	36	35	36
	“Barnea”	100	20	20	17	17
	“Bodoquera”	88	20	23	17	19
	“Cordobes Arroyo Luz”	81	3	4	3	4
	“Cordovil de Serpa-130”	78	4	5	4	5
	“Cornezuelo de Jaen”	88	20	23	19	22
	“Dulzal”	81	11	14	10	12
	“Grosal Vimbodi”	76	3	4	3	4
	“Mahati-1010”	71	12	17	11	15
	“Morisca”	80	3	4	3	4
	“Nevadillo de Sant Pto”	66	7	11	7	11
	TOTAL	1568	233	15	214	14