Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 26;22(9):3318. doi: 10.3390/s22093318

Table 2.

Related work compiled from Beniczky et al., 2021 [4], and this study as comparison. Only those works are included that involve seizure types relevant to this study, that is, any of focal motor seizures, SPS, CPS, or other non-generalized seizures. FAR24: false alarm rate per 24 h; PPV: positive predictive value; FS: focal seizures; SPS: simple partial seizures; CPS: complex partial seizures; hyper: hypermotoric seizures; myo: myoclonic seizures; FS min mot: focal seizures with minimal motor component.

Study Modalities Seizure Types # Pat. w/Seizures # Seizures Sensitivity FAR24 PPV
this study ACC, EDA, PPG FS tonic or clonic 9 20 67–100%/75% 0.85–41.5/13.4 0.6–34.5%/2.1%
[6+ ACC, PPG FS hyper/other major (28 total) 5/14 73%/84% Not reported per seizure type
[8+ ECG FS/SPS/CPS/other (31 total) 8/26/31/5 Not reported per seizure type
[9+,* EDA, ECG, SpO2 CPS 8 23 16.7%/50% 0.7/0.28 6.25%/50%
[10+ ECG SPS/CPS (16 total) 37/38 19%/71% Not reported per seizure type
[18] ACC Tonic/tonic-clonic 15 22 67%/100% Not reported per seizure type
[11+,* ACC CPS 3 5 67% 4.19 22.5
[49+ ACC, EDA FS tonic-clonic 2 6 50% Not reported per seizure type
[12+ ACC Myo, tonic/FS hyper/FS min mot (41 total) 140 6%/24%/2% Not reported per seizure type
[14+ ACC, ECG FS hyper/myo,
tonic cluster
5/5 18/9 Not reported per seizure type
[20] ECG/PPG CPS 11 47 70%/32% 50.6/43.2 2.15%/1.12%
[50] EMG GTCS/tonic/clonic/
other motor
20 18/9/3/17 83%/56%/33%/76% - 83%/50% (t+c)/76%
[51] EEG, ECG, ACC Focal tonic/focal nonmotor 3 47/9 + 9 84%/100% 8/13 + 5 -

+ The study also contained other seizure types, most notably generalized seizures, however the presented data only relates to those seizure types specifically mentioned. * Performance scores only include CPS, calculated by authors from original reported numbers. § Performance scores represent a non-optimized detection, and a refined analysis, respectively.