Skip to main content
. 2022 May 9;14(9):1922. doi: 10.3390/polym14091922

Table 4.

Physicochemical characterization of selected LRX formulations.

Formulation Code Globule Size (nm ± SD) PDI ZP
(mV ± SD)
Viscosity (mPa.s ± SD) Surface Tension (Dynescm−1) pH
Mean ± SD
Drug Entrapment
Efficiency (%)
Mean ± SD
LRX-4 168.4 ± 43.2 0.45 ± 0.03 −21.18 ± 0.15 85.21 ± 2.14 56.34 ± 3.04 4.73 ± 0.29 48.96 ± 5.71
LRX-5 125.8 ± 36.5 0.25 ± 0.04 −25.69 ± 0.58 62.19 ± 3.18 39.59 ± 4.08 5.23 ± 0.41 62.95 ± 1.90
LRX-6 78.6 ± 11.7 0.24 ± 0.02 −29.58 ± 0.61 48.47 ± 2.12 26.46 ± 2.29 5.67 ± 0.45 71.91 ± 3.17
LRX-7 63.3 ± 15.6 0.31 ± 0.06 −24.48 ± 1.12 24.38 ± 3.97 35.01 ± 4.77 4.47 ± 0.31 57.58 ± 6.58
C-LRX 101.3 ± 24.51 0.27 ± 0.04 +20.29 ± 2.10 58.12 ± 5.09 31.05 ± 3.57 5.95 ± 0.35 65.25 ± 4.89

Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3.