TABLE 5.
Methane, sulfate, ferric iron, and nitrate concentrations in benzene-degrading culturesa
Cultures | Day | Concn (μmol/vial) ofb:
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Methane | Sulfate | Fe(III)c | Nitrate | ||
Background control cultures containing nitrate but no benzene | 0 | 0.002 ± 0.00 | 0.71 ± 0.10 | <10d | 113.1 ± 0.9 |
66 | 0.012 ± 0.002 (+0.010) | 0.84 ± 0.00 (+0.13) | <10 (<10) | 89.5 ± 0.5 (−23.6) | |
Active cultures containing nitrate and benzene | 0 | 0.004 ± 0.001 | 0.71 ± 0.10 | <10 | 113.1 ± 0.9 |
66 | 0.013 ± 0.002 (+0.011) | 0.91 ± 0.21 (+0.21) | <10 (<10) | 53.9 ± 0.03 (−59.2) |
The theoretical values based on the amount of benzene actually degraded (3.38 μmol/vial) and the stoichiometries shown in Table 4 were as follows: methane production, 13 μmol/vial; sulfate consumption, 13 μmol/vial; Fe(III) consumption, 101 μmol/vial; and nitrate consumption, 20 μmol/vial.
Data are means ± standard deviations. The values in parentheses are the differences between the day 0 values and the day 66 values. The sulfate and nitrate values can be converted to aqueous concentrations (micromolar) by dividing by the liquid volume (0.01 liter).
Fe(III) concentrations were determined by calculating the difference between the total iron concentration and the Fe(II) concentration.
The concentration was below the detection limit (0.1 mM or 10 μmol/10-ml vial). Both the Fe(II) concentration and the total iron concentration were below the detection limit.