Skip to main content
. 1999 Feb;65(2):529–533. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.2.529-533.1999

TABLE 5.

Methane, sulfate, ferric iron, and nitrate concentrations in benzene-degrading culturesa

Cultures Day Concn (μmol/vial) ofb:
Methane Sulfate Fe(III)c Nitrate
Background control cultures containing nitrate but no benzene 0 0.002 ± 0.00 0.71 ± 0.10 <10d 113.1 ± 0.9
66 0.012 ± 0.002 (+0.010) 0.84 ± 0.00 (+0.13) <10 (<10) 89.5 ± 0.5 (−23.6)
Active cultures containing nitrate and benzene 0 0.004 ± 0.001 0.71 ± 0.10 <10 113.1 ± 0.9
66 0.013 ± 0.002 (+0.011) 0.91 ± 0.21 (+0.21) <10 (<10) 53.9 ± 0.03 (−59.2)
a

The theoretical values based on the amount of benzene actually degraded (3.38 μmol/vial) and the stoichiometries shown in Table 4 were as follows: methane production, 13 μmol/vial; sulfate consumption, 13 μmol/vial; Fe(III) consumption, 101 μmol/vial; and nitrate consumption, 20 μmol/vial. 

b

Data are means ± standard deviations. The values in parentheses are the differences between the day 0 values and the day 66 values. The sulfate and nitrate values can be converted to aqueous concentrations (micromolar) by dividing by the liquid volume (0.01 liter). 

c

Fe(III) concentrations were determined by calculating the difference between the total iron concentration and the Fe(II) concentration. 

d

The concentration was below the detection limit (0.1 mM or 10 μmol/10-ml vial). Both the Fe(II) concentration and the total iron concentration were below the detection limit.