Skip to main content
. 2022 May 7;11(9):2628. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092628

Table 1.

Literature review of perisynthesic fractures of the distal radius with their main features.

Authors
Year of Publication
Years Old Sex Time from Primary Implant Type of Trauma Site of the Fracture Plate Condition Ulnar Fracture Neuro-Vascular Compromise Treatment
De Baere et al.,
2007
58 F 3.5 months Effort Loss of previous reduction Broken No No Substitution of old implant with new plate
Yukata et al.,
2009
82 F 3 months Effort Loss of previous reduction Broken No No Splint
Imade et al.,
2009
56 M 7 days Unknown Loss of previous reduction Broken No No Substitution of old implant with new plate
Geurts et al.,
2012
78 F 6 months Accidental fall Under the plate Bent No Yes Close reduction and alignment of the plate
Khan et al.,
2012
30 M 2 months Unknown Loss of previous reduction Broken No No Substitution of old implant with new plate
Lucke-Wold et al.,
2016
73 F 3 years Trafficaccident Under the plate Bent Yes No Substitution of old implant with new plate
Kanji et al.,
2017
50 M 11 years Trafficaccident Under the plate Bent No Yes Substitution of old implant with new plate
Barrera-Ochoa et al.,
2017
34 M 9 years Traffic accident Proximally to the plate Whole Yes No Substitution of old implant with a longer volar plate and a plate for the ulna
Stramazzo et al.,
2020
61 F 4 years Accidental fall Proximally to the plate Whole Yes No Substitution of old implant with a longer volar plate and a plate for the ulna