Table 7. Who responds to π? (AMT).

This table resents heterogeneity analysis of who is more responsive to the probability of being consequential. Notes: SEs in parentheses. Mixed-consequentialist aggregates for each subject their demographic characteristics’ contribution to the effect of π on the donation decision. Regressions are weighted by the SD of the first regression to account for uncertainty in the calculation of mixed-consequentialist score. Columns 3 and 5 use median regressions. *P < 0.10, **P < 0.05, and ***P < 0.01.

Sample	All subjects	Above median mixed-consequentialist		Below median mixed-consequentialist
	(1)	(2)	(3)*	(4)	(5)*
Mean dep. var.
% Consequential (π)	0.0123	0.0176	0.0452	0.163***	0.118*
π2	(0.0162)	(0.0547)	(0.0574)	(0.0548)	(0.0635)
		−0.000482	−0.000452	−0.00167***	−0.00122*
		(0.000573)	(0.000602)	(0.000581)	(0.000674)
Above median mixed- consequentialist	0.755 (1.119)
π * Above median mixed- consequentialist	−0.0386* (0.0227)
Observations	900	449	449	451	451
R-squared	0.004	0.008		0.019