Skip to main content
. 2022 May 13;10(5):E694–E702. doi: 10.1055/a-1789-0548

Table 1. Characteristics of the eight studies evaluated.

First author Year Study period Design Organ Method Patients, n Age, mean Male, n Lesion, n Size of lesion, mm, mean
Kitamura 12 2021 2006–2019 Retrospective Stomach PCM  20 72.1 ± 11.5  13  20 24.6 ± 11.6
Non-PCM  46 72.7 ± 8.2  29  46 24.4 ± 13.2
Harada 15 2018 2017 Prospective Stomach PCM  48 75.6 ± 6.8  42  48 16.0 ± 6.6
Non-PCM  48 75.2 ± 7.1  44  48 17.6 ± 11.3
Miura 3 2016 2006–2015 Retrospective Duodenum PCM  28 59.6 ± 10.9  16  28 30.5 ± 21.5
Non-PCM  17 62.4 ± 12.7  12  17 21.0 ± 8.1
Kanamori 11 2017 2014–2016 Retrospective Colorectum PCM  47 67.5 ± 11.1  32  47 29.1 ± 11.0
Non-PCM  49 69.7 ± 9.2  33  49 31.1 ± 9.4
Yoshida 10 2018 2006–2017 Retrospective Colorectum PCM  37 65.2 ± 13.5  18  37 31.1 ± 19.3
Non-PCM 500 67.6 ± 10.6 282 500 37.3 ± 15.3
Takezawa 9 2019 2010–2017 Retrospective Colon PCM 266 67.0 ± 9.9 153 278 35.3 ± 13.7
Non-PCM 248 67.0 ± 10.0 143 262 35.7 ± 16.2
Harada 14 2019 2017–2018 RCT Colorectum PCM  46 69.9 ± 10.4  29  46 26.4 ± 6.2
Non-PCM  45 68.9 ± 14.1  26  45 26.8 ± 7.1
Yamashina 13 2020 2016–2018 RCT Colorectum PCM  59 69.3 ± 9.9  34  59 33.4 ± 11.7
Non-PCM  55 67.8 ± 9.4  33  55 31.7 ± 11.5

PCM, pocket-creation method; CM, conventional method; RCT, randomized-controlled trial.