Table 4.
FC Abnormalities in AUD as Predictors of Performance for Each Ataxia Test Condition
Multiple Regression | Eyes open | Eyes closed | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Analyses 1-6 | Stand | Walk | Balance | Stand | Walk | Balance |
F value | 2.02 | 3.87 | 3.66 | 2.33 | 2.51 | 1.27 |
p value | .027 | .007 | .01 | .07 | .05 | .31 |
Effect size (R2) in % | 49% | 56% | 55% | 45% | 47% | 31% |
Predictors | (t-Ratio) p | (t-Ratio) p | (t-Ratio) p | (t-Ratio) p | (t-Ratio) p | (t-Ratio) p |
(+) MFG – MCC | (0.02) .98 | (1.88) .074 | (−0.47) .65 | (−0.32) .76 | (−0.43) .67 | (−0.76) .46 |
(−) MFG – caudate | (−0.08) .94 | (−2.68) .014 | (−0.43) .67 | (1.65) .12 | (0.08) .94 | (0.12) .90 |
(−) IFG – insula | (2.63) .016 | (0.76) .46 | (2.74) .012 | (2.10) .049 | (3.84) .001 | (1.15) .26 |
(−) IFG – SMA | (−1.42) .17 | (−4.14) .001 | (−2.80) .011 | (−2.11) .048 | (−0.79) .44 | (−1.80) .088 |
(+) Cereb. – precuneus | (−0.55) .59 | (−2.37) .028 | (−3.00) .007 | (0.68) .50 | (−0.37) .71 | (−0.87) .39 |
(+) Cereb. – MFG | (−3.80) .001 | (−2.72) .013 | (−2.32) .031 | (−0.88) .39 | (−2.09) .05 | (−1.80) .088 |
(−) ACC – MOG | (−0.80) .43 | (0.62) .54 | (−1.01) .32 | (−0.69) .50 | (−1.01) .33 | (−0.30) .77 |
Note. FC aberration in AUD relative to CTL: (+) hyper-connectivity; (−) hypo-connectivity;
Abbreviations: MFG = middle frontal gyrus; MCC = middle cingulate cortex; IFG = inferior frontal gyrus; Cereb. = cerebellar ROIs; ACC = anterior cingulate cortex; MOG = middle occipital gyrus