Skip to main content
. 2022 May 14;26(7):1529–1539. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03448-9

Table 4.

Multinomial logistic regression model predicting rent-utility hardship

No hardship vs present hardship (ref) Recent hardship vs present hardship (ref)
RRR RRR
(95% CI) P value (95% CI) P value
Medicaid 0.32  < 0.001 0.64 0.085
(0.20,0.51) (0.38,1.06)
Education
 High school 0.73 0.234 0.84 0.546
(0.43,1.23) (0.48,1.47)
 Some college 0.54 0.020 0.86 0.599
(0.32,0.91) (0.49,1.51)
 College +  1.19 0.633 1.05 0.901
(0.59,2.40) (0.50,2.22)
Income-to-poverty ratio 1.14 0.053 0.96 0.609
(0.998,1.30) (0.84,1.11)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic Black 0.50 0.015 1.05 0.876
(0.29,0.87) (0.57,1.94)
 Hispanic 1.03 0.874 1.44 0.150
(0.68,1.57) (0.88,2.36)
Other race/ethnicity 0.78 0.350 0.52 0.045
(0.47,1.31) (0.28,0.99)
Multiple race/ethnicity 0.47 0.055 0.57 0.227
(0.22,1.02) (0.22,1.43)
Language other than English spoken at home 0.76 0.211 0.90 0.721
(0.50,1.17) (0.51,1.59)
Marital status
 Previously married 0.57 0.007 1.04 0.874
(0.38,0.86) (0.65,1.66)
 Never married 0.71 0.168 0.77 0.312
(0.44,1.15) (0.46,1.29)
# of children in home 0.84 0.070 0.94 0.501
(0.70,1.02) (0.77,1.13)
Age of youngest child 0.97 0.170 0.98 0.228
(0.94,1.01) (0.94,1.02)

Data: 2014 Survey of Income and Program Participation; N = 2422

Bolded coefficients are statistically significant at p < .05

RRR relative risk ratio