Skip to main content
. 2022 May 14;101:129–152. doi: 10.1016/bs.afnr.2022.04.002

Table 1.

Comparison of nutritional composition found on traditional (raw) protein sources and two domesticated insects (crickets and yellow mealworms) used for human consumption.

Nutrien Salmona Chickenb Beefc Porkd Cricketse Yellow mealwormse
Protein 22.2% 22.2% 22.5% 21.0% 21.3%% 20.3%
Fat 4.7% 2.6% 8.7% 2.2% 7.3% 13.8%
Carbohydrates 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.1% 3.1%
Fiber 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 1.7%
a

National Nutrient Database for Standard reference (ndb.nal.usda.gov): report 173691 Salmon, sockeye, raw.

b

National Nutrient Database for Standard reference (ndb.nal.usda.gov): report 05062 Chicken, broiler or fryers, breast, skinless, boneless, meat only, raw.

c

National Nutrient Database for Standard reference (ndb.nal.usda.gov): report 1390 Beef Round, prime, raw.

d

National Nutrient Database for Standard reference (ndb.nal.usda.gov): report 10060, Pork, fresh, lion, tenderloin, separable lean only, raw.

e

Whole, raw crickets and mealworms (wet basis with 69.07% and 62.44% moisture content, respectively).

Data adapted from Finke, M. D. (2004). Nutrient content of insects: Springer.; Liceaga, A. M., Aguilar-Toalá, J. E., Vallejo-Cordoba, B., González-Córdova, A. F., & Hernández-Mendoza, A. (2021). Insects as an Alternative Protein Source. Annual review of food science and technology, 13, 19–34; Rumpold, B. A., & Schlüter, O. K. (2013). Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Molecular nutrition & food research, 57(5), 802-823.