Skip to main content
. 2022 May 13;22:421. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03114-3

Table 2.

Prevalence rates of swallowing ability, nutritional status, and chewing ability among nursing home residents between year 2007 and 2013

Total 2007 2013 OR (95% CI)a P value
Swallowing ability
  Oropharyngeal dysphagiab 712/4770 (14.9) 444/2740 (16.2) 268/2030 (13.2) 0.79 (0.66–0.95) 0.010
  Clinical signs of aspirationc 403/4737 (8.5) 254/2720 (9.3) 149/2017 (7.4) 0.76 (0.61–0.96) 0.020
Nutritional status
  Reduced nutrition intaked 767/4752 (16.1) 417/2728 (15.3) 350/2024 (17.3) 1.23 (1.04–1.46) 0.013
  Artificial nutrition 2.57 (1.21–5.44) 0.014
  PEG tube 33/4590 (0.7) 12/2658 (0.5) 21/1932 (1.1) 3.00 (1.34–6.75) 0.008
  Nasogastric tube 17/4611 (0.4) 6/2676 (0.2) 11/1935 (0.6) 3.34 (1.02–10.90) 0.046
Chewing ability
  Good 3118/4875 (64.0) 1775/2782 (63.8) 1343/2093 (64.2) 1.00 (0.87–1.15) 1.000
  Quite good 1199/4875 (24.6) 686/2782 (24.7) 513/2093 (24.5) 1.03 (0.89–1.17) 0.680
  Poor 558/4875 (11.4) 321/2782 (11.5) 237/2093 (11.3) 1.08 (0.88–1.32) 0.475

Data are given as n (%)

PEG percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

aAdjusted for age, sex, cognition, and activity of daily living

bDefined as difficulty in swallowing or showing clinical signs of aspiration during a meal within the last month as observed by a caregiver

cDefined as misdirected swallowing during a meal within the last month as observed by a caregiver

dRefers to reduced nutritional intake the last 3 months