Table 2.
Logistic regression analysis for factors associated with uterine defect and the need for cesarean section
| Uterine defect | |||||
| Factor | B | P value | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| Parity | -0.029 | 0.848 | 0.97 | 0.72 | 1.31 |
| First stage difficulty | Ref | ||||
| Second stage difficulty | 3.50 | 0.003 | 33.0 | 3.36 | 323.81 |
| Impending rupture | 1.61 | 0.011 | 5.0 | 1.45 | 17.27 |
| LUS thickness | -0.724 | 0.038 | 0.49 | 0.24 | 0.96 |
| Myometrial thickness | -0.833 | 0.035 | 0.44 | 0.20 | 0.94 |
| Cesarean section | |||||
| Factor | B | P value | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| Parity | 0.020 | 0.885 | 1.02 | 0.78 | 1.33 |
| LUS thickness | -0.894 | 0.005 | 0.41 | 0.22 | 0.76 |
| Myometrial thickness | -1.125 | 0.002 | 0.33 | 0.16 | 0.66 |
LUS Lower uterine segment