Skip to main content
. 2022 May 11;10:e13432. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13432

Table 3. Post-hoc comparisons of golf putting in different groups and tests.

Source SS df MS F value η p 2 ρ Post hoc
Comparison
Groups (A)
Pretest (b1) 260.51 3 86.84 1.13 .08 .348
Posttest (b2) 2559.70 3 853.23 6.80* .33 .001 a3>a1; a1>a4; a2>a4; a3>a4
Retention 1 (b3) 1514.98 3 504.99 3.48* .20 .024 a2>a1; a2>a4; a3>a4
Retention 2 (b4) 1223.72 3 407.91 4.10 * .23 .012 a3>a1; a2>a4; a3>a4
Residual 18242.09 123 147.50
Tests (B)
S-AOMI (a1) 1037.36 3 347.79 50.57* .84 <.001 b4>b1; b3>b1; b2>b1; b2>b3; b2>b4
A-AOMI (a2) 1377.56 3 459.19 21.31 * .66 <.001 b4>b1; b3>b1; b2>b1; b2>b4
A-S-AOMI (a3) 1996.82 3 665.61 29.62* .75 <.001 b4>b1; b3>b1; b2>b1; b2>b3; b2>b4
Control group (a4) 34.43 3 11.48 .16 .02 .924
Residual 3750.32 123 30.49

Notes.

*

ρ< .05 ; a1: S-AOMI group; a2: A-AOMI group; a3: A-S-AOMI group; a4: control group; b1: pretest; b2: posttest; b3: first skill retention assessment; b4: second skill retention assessment.