Skip to main content
. 2022 May 14;194(1):25–33. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06615-2

Table 4.

Patient-oncologist matching items

Patients Oncs Diff (%)
(1) The switch to biosimilar trastuzumab was explained in an easily understood way 42.3% (63/149) 57.6% (19/33) 15.3
(2) The patient felt involved in this treatment decision to use biosimilar trastuzumab 18.4% (28/152) 18.2% (6/33)  − 0.2
(3) The oncologist is trusted to make the right decision about using biosimilar trastuzumab 62.6% (92/147) 66.7% (22/33) 4.1
(4) The insurance company is trusted to make the right decision about using biosimilar trastuzumab 9.3% (14/150) 12.1% (4/33) 2.8
(5) The hospital/center is trusted to make the right decision about using biosimilar trastuzumab 41.3% (59/143) 44.1% (15/34) 2.9
(6) The patient had the opportunity to ask questions about a switch to biosimilar trastuzumab 35.3% (54/153) 58.8% (20/34) 23.5
(7) The patient was given adequate resources about biosimilar trastuzumab to feel comfortable with this switch 17.6% (27/153) 33.3% (11/33) 15.7
(8) The cancer is/will be treated as effectively with biosimilar trastuzumab 43.4% (62/143) 79.4% (27/34) 36.1
(9) The patient understands the reason for this switch to biosimilar trastuzumab 42.6% (63/148) 39.4% (13/33) -3.2
(10) The patient is worried about this switch to biosimilar trastuzumab (r) 23.6% (35/148) 41.2% (13/34) 17.5
(11) The patient has emotionally adjusted to this treatment switch that wasn’t due to cancer progression or quality of life issues 41.0% (59/144) 42.4% (14/33) 1.5
(12) The patient worries more about treatment success since this switch to biosimilar trastuzumab (r) 29.1% (43/148) 33.3% (11/33) 4.3
(13) Switching to a biosimilar trastuzumab is a minor change in the patient’s care 36.6% (53/145) 66.7% (22/33) 30.1
(r) reverse coded items