Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;13:863675. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.863675

Table 3.

Threshold effect analysis of testosterone on the prevalence of kidney stones using piece-wise linear regression.

Crude ORb (95% CI) p-value Adjusted ORc (95% CI) p-value
All, Testosteronea
Model I one-line 0.904 (0.873, 0.937) <0.001 0.972 (0.935, 1.011) 0.159
Model II turning point: Q5 (386–443) Model II turning point: Q5 (386–443)
<Q5 0.942 (0.884, 1.002) 0.059 <Q5 1.033 (0.966, 1.105) 0.336
≥Q5 0.843 (0.764, 0.930) <0.001 ≥Q5 0.875 (0.731, 0.981) 0.010
Age (20–40) Testosteronea
Model I one-line 0.953 (0.880, 1.031) 0.2271 0.995 (0.906, 1.092) 0.9118
Model II turning point: Q3 (313–363) Model II turning point: Q3 (313–363)
<Q3 0.807 (0.603, 1.080) 0.1499 <Q3 0.809 (0.598, 1.096) 0.1721
≥Q3 1.006 (0.891, 1.136) 0.9257 ≥Q3 1.063 (0.932, 1.213) 0.3645
Age 41–60 Testosteronea
Model I one-line 0.892 (0.839, 0.948) <0.001 0.921 (0.860, 0.987) 0.0193
Model II turning point: Q5 (370–427) Model II turning point: Q6 (427–492)
<Q5 0.941 (0.844, 1.049) 0.2736 <Q6 0.995 (0.906, 1.092) 0.9084
≥Q5 0.810 (0.680, 0.964) 0.0179 ≥Q6 0.657 (0.487, 0.886) 0.006
Age 61–80 Testosteronea
Model I one-line 0.930 (0.883, 0.979) 0.005 0.979 (0.924, 1.038) 0.483
Model II turning point: Q3 (268–318) Model II turning point: Q5 (360–422)
<Q3 1.141 (0.938, 1.389) 0.187 <Q5 1.084 (0.979, 1.200) 0.120
≥Q3 0.872 (0.805, 0.943) <0.001 ≥Q5 0.831 (0.717, 0.963) 0.014

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

a

Presented in eight quantile (ng/dl) and was conducted the with eight quantiles of the total serum testosterone as a continuous variable.

b

Adjusted for: none.

c

Adjusted for: age, race, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, gout, coronary heart, disease, arthritis, angina, heart attack, stroke, smoking, serum total cholesterol, triglycerides, calcium, and uric acid.