Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 8;6(1):e48. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.386

Table 4.

Regression of participant race, race-matching, and intervention type on virtual clinician (VC) credibility, VC attractiveness, message relevance, and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening intention

Predictor variable VC credibility VC attractiveness Message relevance CRC screening intention
B (SE) P* 95% CI B (SE) P* 95% CI B (SE) P* 95% CI B (SE) P* 95% CI
Covariates
Age 0.002 (0.008) 0.8 (−0.01, 0.02) 0.01 (0.01) 0.41 (−0.01, 0.02) −0.03 (0.01) <0.001 (−0.04, −0.02) −0.02 (0.01) <0.001 (−0.04, −0.01)
Sex (women) 0.34 (0.10) <0.001 (0.15, 0.53) 0.58 (0.09) <0.001 (0.41, 0.75) 0.25 (0.08) 0.002 (0.09, 0.41) 0.22 (0.08) 0.009 (0.05, 0.38)
Main effects
Black vs. white participants (ref) 0.38 (0.18) 0.04 (0.03, 0.75) 0.11 (0.16) 0.49 (−0.20, 0.41) 0.24 (0.15) 0.11 (−0.06, 0.54) 0.53 (0.15) <0.001 (0.23, 0.84)
Matched vs. not-matched (ref) −0.25 (0.14) 0.09 (−0.53, 0.04) −0.34 (0.13) 0.01 (−0.61, −0.08) −0.20 (0.13) 0.12 (−0.45, 0.05) −0.17 (0.13) 0.18 (−0.42, 0.08)
Interactive VC vs. static VC (ref) 0.45 (0.13) 0.001 (0.19, 0.72) 0.41 (0.12) <0.001 (0.18, 0.64) 0.26 (0.11) 0.02 (0.04, 0.48) 0.14 (0.11) 0.22 (−0.08, 0.36)
Interactions
VC type × race-matching −0.14 (0.19) 0.47 (−0.51, 0.24) −0.19 (0.17) 0.26 (−0.52, 0.14) 0.12 (0.16) 0.45 (−0.20, 0.44) 0.11 (0.16) 0.51 (−0.21, 0.43)
VC type × participant race 0.16 (0.22) 0.48 (−0.28, 0.60) 0.07 (0.18) 0.69 (−0.28, 0.42) −0.16 (0.17) 0.35 (−0.50, 0.18) 0.02 (0.18) 0.92 (−0.32, 0.36)
Race-matching × participant race 0.56 (0.22) 0.01 (0.12, 1.00) 0.93 (0.18) <0.001 (0.58, 1.29) 0.47 (0.18) 0.01 (0.13, 0.82) 0.29 (0.18) 0.1 (−0.05, 0.64)

Abbreviation: VC, virtual clinician. CRC, colorectal cancer.

*

Regression analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided. B = unstandardized beta-coefficient; CI = confidence interval.