Skip to main content
. 2022 May;36(5):592–599. [Article in Chinese] doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202201005

表 2.

Comparison of clinical parameters between the two groups ( Inline graphic )

两组临床疗效评价指标比较( Inline graphic

组别
Group
例数
n
腿痛VAS评分
VAS score of leg pain
腰痛VAS评分
Vas score of lower back pain
术前
Preoperative
术后1个月
One month after
operation
末次随访
Last follow-up
术前
Preoperative
术后1个月
One month after
operation
末次随访
Last follow-up
UBE-TLIF 35 6.2±0.6 2.9±0.5 1.3±0.5 6.0±0.7 3.3±0.5 1.5±0.5
MT-TLIF 40 6.0±0.7 3.0±0.5 1.3±0.5 6.3±0.7 3.2±0.7 1.6±0.5
统计值
Statistic
时间效应F=2 749.653,P<0.001
交互效应F=5.005,P=0.012
组别效应F=0.028,P=0.868
时间效应F=2 235.37,P<0.001
交互效应F=5.059,P=0.010
组别效应F=0.566,P=0.454
组别
Group
例数
n
ODI(%) SF-36量表评分
SF-36 scale
术前
Preoperative
术后1个月
One month after
operation
末次随访
Last follow-up
术前
Preoperative
术后1个月
One month after
operation
末次随访
Last follow-up
UBE-TLIF 35 65.6±6.4 34.2±3.5 20.7±2.4 28.2±3.2 35.3±2.3 42.7±4.6
MT-TLIF 40 64.5±3.1 37.2±4.2 21.4±2.9 27.8±3.6 35.6±3.2 42.1±3.7
统计值
Statistic
时间效应F=2 620.047,P<0.001
交互效应F=4.243,P=0.016
组别效应F=3.506,P=0.065
时间效应F=444.748,P<0.001
交互效应F=0.568,P=0.515
组别效应F=0.160,P=0.690