Table 3.
Risk of bias assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical appraisal checklist for case series
Authors | Q.1 | Q.2 | Q.3 | Q.4 | Q.5 | Q.6 | Q.7 | Q.8 | Q.9 | Q.10 | %yes/risk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baeder et al. (2021) | U | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | – | N/A | 70%/30% |
Brandão et al. (2021) | U | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | – | N/A | 70%/30% |
Ramires et al. (2021) | √ | √ | √ | N/A | N/A | √ | √ | √ | – | N/A | 60%/40% |
Teixeira et al. (2021) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | – | N/A | 80%/20% |
Garcez et al. (2021) | √ | √ | √ | N/A | √ | √ | √ | √ | – | N/A | 70%/30% |
√-yes; –-No; U-Unclear; N/A-not applicable