Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;13:826635. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.826635

TABLE 6.

Two-way analysis of variance table.

Volatile Genotype
Microbe
Genotype x Microbe
df F P df F P df F P
A - Methyl Salicylate* 4,76 1600.8900 < 0.001 3, 76 3.0686 0.03287 12, 76 1.3638 0.20213
B - (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene* 4,76 125.7786 < 0.001 3, 76 1.2386 0.3016 12, 76 0.7606 0.6881
C - Caryophyllene* 4,76 59.5968 < 0.001 3, 76 0.5181 0.6711 12, 76 1.3894 0.1896
D - Trans-Geranylgeraniol* 4,76 3, 76 12, 76
E - Linalool* 4,76 32.8971 < 0.001 3, 76 0.0671 0.9772 12, 76 0.6448 0.7977
F - β-Myrcene* 4,76 3, 76 12, 76
G -trans-α-Bergamotene 4,76 3, 76 12, 76
H - epi-Bicyclosesquiphellandrene* 4,76 48.6385 < 0.001 3, 76 0.7959 0.4999 12, 76 1.5576 0.1227
I - Germacrene D* 4,76 19.7076 < 0.001 3, 76 0.0849 0.9681 12, 76 0.4616 0.9309
J - D-Limonene* 4,76 12.2691 < 0.001 3, 76 0.5719 0.6353 12, 76 0.2722 0.9920

The top 10 important HIPVs, determined using MDA score via Random Forest Model, were subjected to two-way ANOVA’s with Block as a random effect. The HIPV peak area values were log10 + 1 transformed to assume normality. *Denotes volatiles which were log10 + 1 transformed. ‘−’ in column indicated models which violated ANOVA assumptions after outlier removal and data transformation