Skip to main content
. 2022;15(Suppl 1):S22–S29. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2126

Table 2.

Intergroup comparison of centering ability ratio in apical, middle, and cervical parts of study samples

Centric ability ratio N Mean Std. deviation 95% Confidence interval for mean P value Post hoc pairwise comparison
Lower bound Upper bound
Apical Group I (NiTi K files) 15 2.3874 2.26087 1.1354 3.6394 0.221,NS NA
Group II (ProTaper next files) 15 0.8104 0.57142 0.4939 1.1268
Group III (One Shape files) 15 2.6841 5.12395 -0.1534 5.5217
Group IV (Wave One file) 15 3.3159 3.65016 1.2945 5.3373
Middle Group I (NiTi K files) 15 1.0246 1. 23,056 0.3431 1.7061 0.895,NS NA
Group II (ProTaper next files) 15 1.0858 0.46,877 0.8262 1.3454
Group III (One Shape files) 15 1.4176 2. 40,764 0.0843 2.7509
Group IV (Wave One file) 15 1.2882 1. 50,299 0.4559 2.1205
Cervical Group I (NiTi K files) 15 0.7128 2. 17,168 -0.4898 1.9154 0.04, S Group I, group II < group III < group IV
Group II (ProTaper next files) 15 0.7839 0.31,988 0.6067 0.9610
Group III (One Shape files) 15 1.0429 0.96,142 0.5104 1.5753
Group IV (Wave One file) 15 2.7134 3. 50,781 0.7709 4.6560